Blog article
See all stories »

Banks - time to deliver new customer value

Banks - especially Investment banks - are now being squeezed from all sides - revaluation of securitized papers to unrealistically low market price levels, losses from credit books as economies nosedive, new costs from all sorts of more or less needed regulation, restructuring costs etc - all also leading to higher funding costs.

On the other hand there is clear evidence that customers are prepared to pay for reliable house banking relationship (only to forget it again when times get better..) - in good times you can manage with bad bankers but in bad times you cannot manage without good ones (I have been through a couple of downturns in 30 years as a commercial banker - and dare to say that we managed to keep virtually all enterprises afloat that were worth the effort). The normal behavior also then was that higher risks called for higher margins, more securities and stricter covenants and as long as the owners chipped in their part,  financing was reorganized and even increased to bridge over the troubled waters.

Despite most bankers having done a proper job then and now - media at large was and is again resorting to lynching mentality - "a banker cannot be good - hang them all..". With nobody questioning this, it is to expected that elections will be won with this kind of slogans (even if media credibility is systematically being eroded - by media itself). Then it has to be said, that the case of stupid extravaganzas in a few instances - after having had to resort ot taxpayers' support - makes it easy for the populists.

But what should banks do now to start to rebuild their scattered images? Back to profitability and basics is for sure one route - simple robust real services - less marketeer driven gimmicks and "products" nobody really understand. But more than that, there is a big area where banks are now needed more than ever before. This is the what we call extended payments services. All the way from potentially doubling the payment volumes by moving into networked sourcing, routing and presenting e-invoices, e-orders, e-confirmations, e-salaries, e-pensions etc to e-id, e-signatures and real time payments - services needed in the networked and increasingly real-time economy. Only banks have the possibility to handle this in a cost-efficient way for the largest sector - the SMEs and the consumers. As the investment needs are minimal and the sales force is there anyway it should not be difficult to reach profitability as soon as the transaction volume tipping point is achieved. The downside is in any case minimal.

Lowering of costs > better productivity > stronger competitive position in a global economy is now badly needed in the entire corporate customer base. Will banks take their responsibility?

4682

Comments: (4)

Ed Daniel
Ed Daniel - esdaniel.com - Europe 18 February, 2009, 02:55Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

I vote for disruption, it's about time they read Christian's book on dilemmas and solutions for innovators.

Bo Harald
Bo Harald - Transmeri, Demos, Real Time Economy Program,MyData - Helsinki Region 18 February, 2009, 10:25Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Disruption - yes. But also disruption needs a base to build on. It is after all human behavior that has to change.

John Bullard
John Bullard - TrustChains - London 19 February, 2009, 09:33Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Bo;

As a commercial banker of a mere 22 yrs, I wholeheartedly endorse your views.

Bankers always have been in the business of risk management- and they have built this up over centuries in 3 main areas (rather like 3 legs of a bankers stool), namely:

Credit Risk Management- ie The Acceptance of Deposits and lending of them to Borrowers.

Capital/Trading Risk Management- ie Trading often on their own account in markets, currencies etc

Operational/Transactional Risk Management- ie The moving of money and/or value around networks/clearing/settlement systems etc domestically & globally 24x7. Historically, many will view this as the original role of the banker- with the other two being "applications" thereof.

Today two legs of the bankers stool are seriously damaged, but that 3rd leg Operational/Transactional Risk remains intact and keeps the wheels of society turning.

There is an enormous financial opportunity (and political gain/qudos) for banks to focus far more heavily on Transaction Management (not just transaction banking) in a world of ubiquitous largely free-to-use electronic networks- where they can help their customers manage the very significant operational risks associated with doing business in this new environment- you mention a few of them; basically, wherever paper and a handwritten signature have prevailed historically (private or public sector), the survivors of these tough economic times will look to use electronic networks and electronic signatures to support their business porcesses- regardless of borders/industry delineations/product set etc.

Bankers have an opportunity of historic proportions to apply their skillsets in this field, which if they grasp it, will help gradually restore the other two legs of their stools.

Bo Harald
Bo Harald - Transmeri, Demos, Real Time Economy Program,MyData - Helsinki Region 16 March, 2011, 13:56Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

This so to the point - landmark remarks

Bo Harald

Bo Harald

Chairman/Founding member, board member

Transmeri, Demos, Real Time Economy Program,MyData

Member since

04 Nov 2008

Location

Helsinki Region

Blog posts

448

Comments

305

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Innovation in Financial Services

A discussion of trends in innovation management within financial institutions, and the key processes, technology and cultural shifts driving innovation.


See all

Now hiring