Community
This is a very short note I felt compelled write to share my sense of frustration.
I am a strong believer in the Peer-to-Peer concept and business models. However I see an indiscriminate use of the "P2P" term for all sorts of solutions and offerings, with very little (to be generous) relation to the true objectives (and caveats) of P2P: extended reach; visibility; self-controlling; dis-intermediation; increased responsibility; setting higher expectations; higher risk of failure.
My concern is that "P2P" sounds just about "sexy" and therefore it will be used as a general-purpose brand for all sorts of intents ad purposes. See what's happened with "SaaS", "Cloud", and "2.0"?
Bottom line: P2P risks of becoming yet another "marketing bandwagon" doomed to pass away with the fashion season. Serious P2P players are still in time to properly educate the market and establish the right boundaries of the P2P ecosystem.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Darya Lyhach PR manager at Noda
23 April
Teo Blidarus CEO and Co-Founder at FintechOS
Jason Delabays Ecosystem Lead at Zama
22 April
Igor Kostyuchenok SVP of Engineering at Mbanq
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.