Blog article
See all stories »

RBI’s cautious approach kept India safe from BNPL issues

RBI

NatWest in UK last week announced that it is ditching its BNPL products and many experts not are attributing this due to the over crowded market and banks may gradually become less interested in these products.

London still having a huge heft in the global financial market, has no regulation in place as yet and now Banks are left to decide by themselves to see what products are adding to their topline or are becoming a burden for their bottom line. Though the Financial Conduct Authority has sent consistent warnings to firms over potentially risky financial promotions under the BNPL portfolio, but regulations are still no where in sight.

This scenario has made Reserve Bank of India look very progressive and increasingly sensitive to the protection of common people when they came out with their statement saying non-banks can't load credit lines on prepaid instruments, way back in Jun 2022. Their official explanation and summary in The Economic Times were that RBI’s clarification is being seen as an effort to clamp down on card-based FinTech and firms operating as neobanks that have tied up with banks to offer credit lines.

As there was no clear regulation in place for non-banks to operate in these products, it was a wise move to clamp down the transgressions. This may have been seen as a restricting move but this is not the first time RBI has taken such a stance for non-bank entities. First time such a move was made back in 2006-07 when Airtel was discouraged to introduce phone to phone balance transfer scheme for its prepaid card users because of lack of KYC and due diligence checks, which were much less stringent for non-banks as compared to banks.

What is your take on RBI’s move in 2022 with the hindsight of 20 months? Do you believe they should’ve handled it differently? Please share your views.

4435

Comments: (1)

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune 12 March, 2024, 11:36Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

I agree with RBI's Enforcement Actions like Reg PayTM and Reg BPSP, even if some have found it disproportionately harsh.

I disagree with RBI's "throw baby out with the bathwater" policy making like Reg Emandate, Reg PPI and Reg UL.

My Two Cents On PayTM Kerfuffle.

If a poor country like India has any chance of leveraging emerging market dynamics and become a middle income country within the forseeable future, it can only be by being entrepreneurial, taking risks and exhibting "animal spirits", as various politicians and government leaders have regularly highlighted. RBI's extreme aversion to risk in policy making is more suited to countries that are already rich and must prioritize capital protection over growth à la how PWM / Private Banking customers behave versus how Retail Banking customers behave. 

You can find my take on NatWest v. India BNPL in my comment below the article

Shailendra Malik

Shailendra Malik

SVP - Tech Delivery (Data Platform)

DBS Bank

Member since

25 Apr 2016

Location

Singapore

Blog posts

51

Comments

20

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Banking

Banks nowadays are in stiff competition for human resources with fintech. The financial technology sector often offers higher pay. Still, the prospects of many such start-ups are difficult to forecast – they are as likely to occupy a solid niche as they are to go bust. Stable companies in Latvia are only a handful. Primarily, fintech players active in Latvia are headquartered in foreign countries – the United Kingdom, to name one – despite maintaining offices in Riga and employing staff in Latvia


See all

Now hiring