Blog article
See all stories »

Everyone with payment wallets but how about Identity Wallets

Being in identity and security space for quite a while now, obviously when I talk to friends and family, they all get excited about whole identity verification and cutting-edge technology behind it. One very logical and obvious question I often get asked is, “Well I have this payment app/wallet (Apple pay or google pay or Paytm or what not) I am using frequently and find it very useful, have you not thought about something similar for keeping my identity with me, on my phone?”. My answer (and reverse question) often is “Indeed we have thought about it and in fact there are already many such apps in app store, have you tried one?” “Well, Not really!! As I don’t have immediate need” is the answer to my reverse question.

Would it not be cool if I could have a nice app where I can store my identity data and every time I have to open an account or rent a car, I can simply use my identity data for verification in few seconds, zip-zap.

What is going on here seems logic defying. Many companies have tried it (remember Civic from ICO days, one of the early entrants? Well, that’s just one, there are many) and still continue but with very little success or traction (it is not hard to find their app download data from public sources).

I have not done any detailed quantitative study for this phenomenon yet, but I have built some hypothesis over time on why we do not see success with identity wallets as we see with payment wallets. I am going to list some of those hypotheses –

 1.     I don’t really open new accounts that often (unlike payments I do with payment apps/wallets)

Consumers are strongly driven by user experience and convenience. If they are not repeating a task very often, they have a little mindshare for it. Me as a consumer may be doing strong identity verification online few times a year, why bother, let the service provider handle it.

 2.     Still fragmented and localized approaches and user experiences

Government and regulatory bodies have not come up with a consistent global standard on digital identity or even guidance to private companies unlike in payment industry. Largely driven by citizens’ attitude to privacy, local cultures as well as the control regulatory bodies like to keep on user’s identity. Even within EU, despite EIDAS recommendations, there is no consistent standard and user experience adopted by various member states. Large private enterprises can try and unify that, but complexity of systems and localized control make it almost impossible to have something that is truly global.

If you don’t believe me, just try it out for yourself

https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/cas/login?loginRequestId=ECAS_LR-6491496-ttyX76ELx1kwWJX7dVFJJf9s96c0yPRn8iy4JX1k8zZD81tIkLygvBsOzIzTlSKKBQxkvRwpLzLmlyjkMitAGzd-yntOf97TTHqNKSyhroY4hS-T9tSX0Pc8zgg1I1of7SlarFHqAFvhgaJtuFmiZYdKMwoPH2lb3Tbm6K2h73XQW8EFYtyJYlsDT0owgaDll5eKi

3.     Different regulations and requirements

Depending on use case and vertical, regulators have dictated different standards for identity verification. Verification requirements while opening a bank account is different from renting a car online is different from activating a sim card. Variations exist within a country let alone having any commonalities across regions. These differences exist for all good reasons and level of assurance need not be same in all cases and can vary depending on risk associated. But on the other hand they indeed can present a great challenge for truly global digital identity schemes. If as a consumer I have to manage different wallets for different use cases, why bother, even less!

Having painted a gory picture above, life is not as bad it seems. There is a lot still going on to achieve this ubiquitous digital identity goal. Apple has started trialing digital driver license in USA. Samsung is working closely with German government and BSI to trial digital identity on phones to start with and various bank ID schemes in many countries. These efforts are still very local and use case/ country specific, but hope is they can teach us a lot during these trials. Real success will only come once we can motivate consumers to truly see the value in such identity wallets with seamless user experience and ease of use they get with payment wallets. True global and ubiquitous digital identity is sure to accelerate once we will start seeing network effects and efforts need to continue in this direction by regulators, governments and private enterprises as at the end of the day we all will benefit from it.

Being not a fully researched topic it will be great to hear your thoughts and hypothesis as well.

 

2034

Comments: (2)

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune 26 January, 2021, 14:33Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Since you mention PayTM, India must be on your radar. ICYMI, Digital ID is a non-issue in India, thanks to Aadhaar e-KYC carried out via Mobile OTP. I recently got approved instantly, and entirely online, for Amazon Pay Later BNPL product via this Digital ID.

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 26 January, 2021, 15:01Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Interesting and valid points.

Vikas Seth
Blog group founder

Vikas Seth

Chief Product Officer

IDnow Gmbh

Member since

23 Mar 2019

Location

Germany

Blog posts

5

Comments

1

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Digital Identity Management

Discuss upcoming trends in digital proofing, authentication, fraud and digital identity management.


See all