19 July 2018
Enrico Camerinelli

Enrico Camerinelli

Enrico Camerinelli - Aite Group

69Posts 587,063Views 65Comments
Finextra community

Financial Supply Chain

In the world of international trade, the process of exchanging payments, information and documents between buyers, sellers, banks, and other involved parties is becoming increasingly important for financial institutions. This community aims at presenting views and innovative ideas related to this financial supply chain space.

A Paradigm Shift in Supply Chain Finance

17 February 2012  |  5630 views  |  0

I see a change in the way supply chain finance (SCF) is being perceived in the market. I still have to form myself a more structured opinion so I'll just jot down my thoughts as they come.

"Old" SCF: Basically the management of cash and capital to support the execution of supply chain processes (e.g., delivery of the goods).
"New" SCF: Financial instruments that extract liquidity from supply chain (SC) processes.

"Old" SCF: Financial instruments that generate liquidity/cash FOR the SC processes.
"New" SCF: Financial instruments that generate liquidity/cash FROM the SC processes.

"Old" SCF for large corporates: Optimize working capital and minimize risk. "New" SCF for large corporates: Generate better yield from extra cash (which comes from bettter managed SC operations).

"Old" SC for SMEs: Get liquidity to run the business (i.e., FOR the SC operations).
"New" SCF: Get immediate payments from buyers through receivables (i.e., which come FROM better managed SC processes).

My brain dump is finished at this hour of a Friday evening but I hope you get my point: The paradigm of SCF shifts from SCF=liquidity/cash FOR the supply chain to SCF= liquidity/cash FROM the supply chain.

In the first case the focus is on the (financial) PRODUCTS that generate liquidity.
In the second, the focus is on the PROCESSES FROM which liquidity is generated (i.e., extracted). This should make bank product managers think...

Enjoiy your weekend.

TagsPaymentsWholesale banking

Comments: (1)

Enrico Camerinelli
Enrico Camerinelli - Aite Group - Boston 19 February, 2012, 15:43

A comment from a reader:

<<Hi Enrico, agree with you. Anchor (e.g., buyers, sellers) and their supply chain collaboration (SCC) will shift from passive to active (or driving the) SCF. Integrators can play a role by bridging banks trade finance products to SCC balance sheets>>.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups!
Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Enrico

Community NdT Blockchain Use Cases

10 June 2018  |  4717 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsBlockchainInnovationGroupBlockchain Observations

From 'what could be done' to 'how we do it'

11 May 2018  |  6009 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsBlockchainInnovationGroupBlockchain Observations

Blockchain is not a CIO’s business: C-levels need Business Cases

05 May 2018  |  6236 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsBlockchainInnovationGroupBlockchain Observations

Blockchain in the Supply Chain Use Cases- Digital Passport

29 April 2018  |  4848 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsBlockchainInnovationGroupBlockchain Observations

Banks, supply chains, and blockchain

18 April 2018  |  12997 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 2 TagsBlockchainWholesale bankingGroupFuturistic Banking

Enrico's profile

job title sr. analyst
location Boston
member since 2009
Summary profile See full profile »
Senior Analyst for Corporate Banking, based in Europe. Current research focuses on Global Transaction Banking, Supply Chain Finance and Working Capital Management.

Enrico's expertise

Member since 2008
59 posts65 comments
What Enrico reads

Who's commenting on Enrico's posts