/artificial intelligence

News and resources on artificial intelligence systems, innovations and initiatives worldwide.

Bank profits face $170bn hit from AI - McKinsey

Failure to adapt to consumers' increased use of AI could see banks lose as much $170bn, according to a report from McKinsey.

  4 2 comments

Bank profits face $170bn hit from AI - McKinsey

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

The management consultant states that a growing number of bank consumers are turning to AI to optimise their finances. This includes the use of agentic AI and autonomous bots.

According to McKinsey, this could affect the amount that banks make from customers with low interest accounts

“Imagine you have an AI agent that says: ‘Hey, you could save $2,000-a-year by moving your money,’” said Pradip Patiath, a senior partner at McKinsey, whose comments were reported by Bloomberg. “It automates a lot of the inertia that is in the system today.”

The McKinsey report states that $23tn of the $70tn in the consumer banking sector are held in zero interest accounts. Unless banks adapt their offerings, this could amount to a loss of 9% to the bottom line, which would push average returns for banks below the cost of capital. 

And while the use of AI should lead to initial savings of between 15% and 20% of operating costs. These benefits will erode over time due to competition. 

 

Sponsored [New Report] Modernising Liquidity Management for Real-Time Banking

Comments: (2)

A Finextra member 

I can only imagine the potential for fraud as/when Agentic AI starts recommending moving money into accounts that might appear to be too good to be true......   What IS true is that many bank systems are not yet composible enough to be able to respond with the agility needed.   Maybe we are looking at the banking and financial services equivalent of the industrial revolution or the KT Boundary event?  Those to persist with legacy banking systems (the Dinosaurs) or the Manual manufacturing or agricultural systems are doomed to be surpassed by more agile - future friendly entities.....  These things take time, evolution needs to start today.... Bankers should be looking for their Agile/composable/No-code banking software now... if they dont have it already

Ketharaman Swaminathan

Ketharaman Swaminathan Founder and CEO at GTM360 Marketing Solutions

MINT and other PFM / MoMMA apps have been giving these "Hey! Save $2,000-a-year by moving money" alerts for nearly 20 years, and still customers didn't bother to take action, as the $27T deposits in zero interest accounts stands testimony. Even the Bank Account Number Portability regulatory mandate didn't change the status quo significantly. On the other hand, when SVB and a couple of other banks went bust, it led to a flight of capital to the 0.01% interest accounts of JPMC, BofA, etc. 

Let's see if McKinsey's GTM driven by Loss Aversion Principle drives much change in consumer behavior now. IMO, if the new breed of AI Agent automatically moves deposits to higher yield accounts, it could achieve what traditional PFM and MoMMA apps failed to achieve in the last 20 years.

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

[On-Demand Webinar] Redefining Global Transaction Banking with A2A and Cross-Border PaymentsFinextra Promoted[On-Demand Webinar] Redefining Global Transaction Banking with A2A and Cross-Border Payments