/payments

News and resources on payments systems, innovations and initiatives worldwide.

FCA consults on proposals to scrap contactless limits

The UK's Financial Condut Authority is consulting on proposals to raise contactless limits for larger payments.

  2 4 comments

FCA consults on proposals to scrap contactless limits

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

In a move first trailed in January, the FCA says it is looking into whether removing the current £100 limit could benefit consumers, merchants and economic growth in the UK by giving people and businesses greater choice, flexibility and smoother purchases.

The contactless limit was raised from £45 in 2021, just a year after a rise from £30 amid a surge in tap and pay during the Covid-19 pandemic.

One option under consultation is allowing firms who use technology to reinforce strong fraud controls to set their own limits, as happens in the United States. Suh a stance would level the playing field with digital wallets, which are already able to offer higher limits through biometric controls.

David Geale, executive director of payments and digital finance at the FCA, says: "We‘re seeing smarter payment technology and more well-established fraud controls, so it’s the right time to let firms tailor contactless payments to fit their customers’ needs and drive innovation. While we wouldn’t expect to see immediate changes to limits by firms, they would have the flexibility to make payments more convenient for customers.

"People are still protected; even with contactless, firms will refund your money if your card is used fraudulently."

UK Finance’s Annual Fraud Report 2025 estimates that contactless fraud rates are currently low at circa 1.3p per £100 spent on contactless transactions, compared to 6p per £100 for all unauthorised fraud.

Nonetheless, a higher limit and therefore bigger payoff would be a temptation for further fraudulent attempts.

Reflecting these fears, 78% of consumers who responded to the FCA's initial engagement paper said they did not want any change to the limits.

TheFCA says it received nearly 1,300 responses to the  paper and it believes that most firms will continue to implement the £100 limit 'for the time being'.

The proposals are out for consultation until 15 October 2025.

Sponsored [Webinar] Financing & Delivering Resilient Infrastructure: Discover SustainableFinance.Live’s 2025 Hackathon

Comments: (4)

A Finextra member 

People are protected = Criminals will get away with larger sums of money, subsidised by banks, on Lost/Stolen cards used immediately to test the upper limit of the card, which probably was taken out of the Mobile phone card pouch that came along with the recently snatched phone........ Another victimless crime - other than the consumer who will fight to get their money back, and the banks that will subsidise the criminals.   Cards dont have biometic controls, mobile wallets do!

Jeremy Light

Jeremy Light Co-founder at Fourdotzero

There is no demand or logic to this:

  • contactless transactions are unauthorised - increasing the limit increases the amount that can be taken fraudulently
  • contactless fraud is 100%+ higher since the last increase from £45
  • strong customer authentication has made a big impact on containing fraud, why relax it and encourage fraud?
  • the majority of contactless are now made by smartphones which are more secure and have no limit - contactless by card is declining
  • the typical contactless payment is well below £100, this combined with the majority use of smartphones means there is very little demand or need to scrap limits
  • the 1.3p contactless fraud rate v the 6.0p overall card fraud rate is a misleading comparison, as the overall rate includes ecommerce and phone transactions where contactless is unusable. More importantly, the UK Finance fraud report shows that contactless fraud is half of all face-to-face card fraud, the only scenario for contactless fraud and the proportion is increasing
  • the FCA's own research shows 78% of consumers want to keep limits as they are, why ignore them?
  • economic growth is achieved by producing more goods and services - there is no reason or evidence that increasing a contactless limit increases production

What is the real reason for this proposal? 

A Finextra member 

The increase of unauthorized payments (no SCA up to GBP 100) will increase also fraudulent payments and fuel criminals further. The stupid reason to "level the playing field with mobile wallets" is wrong as mobile contactless contains biometric authentication of the payer. Is the FCA on the take or have they smoked something? Instead the FCA should consider a rule for all issuers that gives the cardholder the option to lower the contactless limit at own preference when a card is to be issued/reissued. . 

A Finextra member 

That would be a useful tool within any issuers 'card controls' setting - turn off or turn down the contactless limit on the card - or set the Consecutive offline PIN counter to zero, to force card and PIN transactions at contactless terminals.   I believe a standard Student approach to finding a lost card is to buy a round of drinks before handing the card in (payment for good behaviour?).  I believe this approach does indicate the lack of experience within the FCA and their need to score political 'GROWTH DRIVING' points with their government masters........ the only growth this will drive will be that of the criminal underclass.....     Pushing up Electronic transactions against Cash - so that a more powerful case can be made for the elimination of anonymous - off grid - cash transactions.....    

[Webinar] Navigating Banking Platform Modernisation: How to Fuse Reliability with InnovationFinextra Promoted[Webinar] Navigating Banking Platform Modernisation: How to Fuse Reliability with Innovation