Blog article
See all stories ยป

If you read this, I will sue you


We share secrets with other people daily, from trivial "I've just heard that..." gossips to stuff like "My best friend's girlfriend is pregnant. By me." (LEGAL DISCLAIMER: [Insert a blob about "for illustration purposes only" and "forward-looking statement" here] - my friends are either married or don't have girlfriends, not that it would have changed anything).

When I make a new business contact, online or offline, I often need to send that person some commercially sensitive information as the next step. We are not talking about state secrets or Coca-Cola formula, but simply something which you cannot Google (yet).

If we were having a personal conversation, face-to-face or over the phone, and I had to disclose such information, I'd say "in complete confidence" or "entrez nous" (I think "sub rosa" would draw strange looks). And then we would carry on with our conversation as normal. During media interviews, it is a common practice to use "off the record" (that doesn't mean, by the way, the journalists would not use or publish the information you share - they simply cannot attribute it to you).

But when it comes to sharing sensitive information via emails, people react differently. At TEDIPAY, irrespective of whether we have an NDA in place with the recipient or not, we always mark sensitive information and data as "strictly confidential" (often in block capitals, marked in bold and highlighted in yellow). That is the analogy of saying "we chose to trust you and would appreciate/expect you to keep that information to yourself."

Yet, sometimes the recipients would respond with "I cannot receive confidential documentation without suitable legal agreements in place". Do we really need an agreement to share something with someone on the "for your eyes/ears only" basis? What has happened to common sense? And the gentlemen's handshake? Do BLOCK CAPITALS in bold scare people? (Apparently, they do - we get fewer "NDA scares" when we use simple "in confidence", although the meaning is still the same).

A disclaimer does not automatically constitute an obligation (take warnings on cigarette packs, for example). It's a simple request. Like "please". Treat it that way. Please.

Apologies for somewhat off-the-topic post - most of the "NDA scares" we get are from the banks, so there is a link there.


Comments: (3)

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 18 January, 2013, 14:26Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Google has the ideal, IMO, NDA approach: once you reached the NDA signing stage, they email you the link to a Web page with "no nonsense" 11-point NDA.

You fill in your details and click on the "I accept" button (it is still a mutual NDA). Done.


Philip Harrison
Philip Harrison - - London 18 January, 2013, 15:49Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Alexander....thanks for another very entertaining blog... :)

I would comment further...but do we have an NDA in place?...


A Finextra member
A Finextra member 18 January, 2013, 15:55Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes


Apparently, our companies do indeed have a mutual NDA in place, but I don't think it stretches to Finextra :)

Have a nice weekend.

Member since




More from member

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Innovation in Financial Services

A discussion of trends in innovation management within financial institutions, and the key processes, technology and cultural shifts driving innovation.

See all