Community
In Part I of my Risk-based Collections blog series, I described the differences between Judgmental and Statistical Scoring models. In part II, I will expand upon the specific uses of these models, in particular managing existing credit lines.
For evaluating a request for additional credit or determining the collectability of an existing customer account, statistical-based models are more prevalent than ever, and being adopted by first time users of scoring models. Statistical-based models utilize payment behavior. They look at your own experience with each customer to help you evaluate their future risk and use that information to manage their credit lines. The only caveat is that companies using a statistical-based model must have a sufficient number of accounts as well as the required data to build the model.
Typically, a portfolio of at least 1,500 accounts and eighteen to twenty-four months of accounts receivable data is required for an effective model. If you don’t meet these criteria, a judgmental-based model together with credit bureau data would be the best approach. The volume of the accounts that need to be evaluated is the major driver of what methodology to use. For example:
How are you managing existing credit lines today? Are you using or thinking about using statistical-based scoring models when managing credit lines? I’d like to hear from you.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Kathiravan Rajendran Associate Director of Marketing Operations at Macro Global
10 December
Scott Dawson CEO at DECTA
Roman Eloshvili Founder and CEO at XData Group
06 December
Daniel Meyer CTO at Camunda
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.