Community
Wrote this last year:
"So sensemaking to let citizens log in to public sector with e-bank log-on tools.
This is so saving both tax payer's money and speeding up e-government as tools are familiar, trusted and much more convenient than any public-sector-only tool would be. Several countries have already this so obviously beneficial public-private partnership in place. Anybody knowing one reason for why this option should not be possible all over EU?
Policy naturally based on the Three neutralities:
1. service provider neutrality (not banks only - but any strong e-id service need to be supervised - strong enough tool and strong enough physical identification)
2. tool neutrality (one time codes, certificates today - new ones welcome)
3. platform neutrality (important for mobile e-id - SIM, multimedia cards, security elements - in accordance with Mobey Forum policy papers)
E-commerce payments (real time) are also growing steadily (5,3 million inhabitants..).
Much work to do of course to first connect the local e-id and e-payments to an EU standard pipeline and then start working on end2end - just like with e-invoicing."
2010 was a great e-id-service year in Finland: 21,7 m transactions (most to the public sector - so far only by banks) - 61% growth. EU-level equivalent: 1,5bn...
e-commerce payments volume 29,9m (+29%) - EU-equivalent: 1,8bn..
This is innovation in reality.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Stanley Epstein Associate at Citadel Advantage Group
30 October
29 October
Carlo R.W. De Meijer The Meyer Financial Services Advisory (MIFS) at MIFSA
28 October
Aare Reintam Chief Operating Officer at CybExer Technologies
27 October
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.