Community
AI-assisted coding tools have added incredible momentum to software development. As the Managing Director of a software development company, many of my teams use AI coding tools daily. They help my teams build faster, remove tedious manual work, and prototype new ideas quickly.
In the fintech industry, where innovation cycles are tightening, AI’s ability to accelerate workflows is highly attractive. However, the financial sector also demands precision, security, and regulatory compliance - areas where AI assistance must be managed very carefully.
AI has proven valuable in building internal fintech tools, developing administrative platforms, and generating standard backend processes. Automating boilerplate code, CRUD operations, and basic reporting modules are examples where AI coding assistants deliver measurable time savings without introducing significant risk.
For proof-of-concept applications and internal dashboards, AI can accelerate the validation of new ideas, helping teams move from ideation to early testing faster than ever before.
These strengths, however, are most beneficial when human oversight remains firmly in place. Even when AI helps draft code or structure systems, experienced developers must validate every step to ensure scalability, security, and long-term maintainability.
While AI can handle routine coding tasks, it struggles in areas that fintech companies cannot afford to compromise. Applications involving payment processing, fraud prevention, identity verification, and regulatory reporting require a depth of domain knowledge that AI models simply do not possess.
In my experience, the most dangerous risks introduced by AI-generated code in fintech include:
Hidden security vulnerabilities, particularly in payment flows and authentication systems
Incomplete or incorrect compliance with standards like PCI DSS, GDPR, or PSD2
Technical debt accumulation from code that "works" initially but fails under real-world financial system demands
Intellectual property risks from AI outputs that replicate or closely mirror open-source code without proper licensing controls
Fintech leaders should treat these risks with the seriousness they deserve. AI outputs must be reviewed carefully, tested rigorously, and never deployed into production without thorough validation.
Fintech demands more than just functional code; it requires code that is reliable, defensible, secure, and compliant. AI models cannot fully grasp the nuances of complex business rules, regional regulations, or evolving customer protection laws.
Decisions about system architecture, transaction security, and auditability still require human experience and strategic thinking.
Where AI shines is in supplementing developer productivity - not replacing the need for skilled engineering leadership.
AI-assisted development, when used properly, allows technical teams to move faster while allocating more time to tasks that require deep expertise, such as designing secure APIs, optimizing data flows, and maintaining regulatory alignment across global markets.
When leveraged carefully, AI can assist in initial code audits, highlighting common issues such as redundant database queries, inefficient loops, or missing documentation. However, detecting deeper architectural flaws, security vulnerabilities, and compliance gaps continues to rely on skilled auditors and senior developers.
In my view, AI should be treated as a productivity tool that helps surface potential problems more quickly - but it cannot replace the final human judgment needed to ensure fintech platforms are built to the highest standards of security and reliability.
AI will continue to play an important role in fintech development. It offers speed, reduces repetitive workload, and can assist with early prototyping. But when it comes to delivering trusted, scalable, and compliant financial applications, human expertise remains irreplaceable.
For fintech companies exploring AI integration, it’s worth investing in regular code audits and architecture reviews to ensure that the benefits of AI are matched by the security and quality your users expect. A careful, measured approach will always yield better long-term outcomes than a rush to automate.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Leon Fischer-Brocks Co-Founder | CEO at Bloxley
22 May
Priyanka Rao Content Strategist at Jupiter Money
Vijay Mayadas President, Capital Markets at Broadridge
19 May
Erica Andersen Marketing at smartR AI
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.