Community
Chargebacks shouldn’t have to be part of the cost of doing business, but unfortunately for many merchants it is their reality. This creates a real challenge for businesses of all types, everywhere.
Consumers are increasingly leaving merchants out of the dispute process, initiating a fraud-related chargeback directly with issuing banks up to 76 per cent1 of the time. In fact, issuers and merchants alike believe that it is too easy for consumers to dispute transactions. This vulnerability in the dispute process, as it has evolved over time, may be contributing to a growing risk of friendly fraud.
When a merchant learns of a dispute, it's often too late to even begin a chargeback defence. The merchant loses the chance to resolve the consumer’s issue, determine if true fraud has happened, or avoid additional and significant chargeback losses. And it’s only getting worse.
By continuing the current broken chargeback process, costs will continue to escalate for merchants and issuers. Based on research conducted by Verifi and Javelin Strategy & Research, in 2017 chargebacks were a $31 billion problem in the US market alone, with $19 billion of the burden falling squarely on merchants. To make matters worse, research has shown that 63 per cent of consumers ceased merchant patronage after a dispute, which is not a sustainable trend.
So, what are the key challenges facing merchants, and what can they do?
The challenges
Merchants are in a precarious position when it comes to chargebacks.
They typically find out about the dispute too late in the process to take active measures, and face three key challenges within the chargeback process. These are:
The odds stacked against merchants’ success are even higher when considering the short and long-term impacts on customer retention and lost brand loyalty.
The cost to merchants
Merchant chargeback liability can include fines and fees, refund costs, recovery of lost merchandise, and the loss of customer loyalty. The most common charges associated with chargebacks that merchants face are:
If merchants are frozen out early in the dispute process, they are put on the back foot and must play catch-up when investigating fraudulent activity. This gives fraudsters an opening to commit further criminal acts, creating a troublesome cycle of challenges for merchants. In addition to this, the manual review process required to review disputes is a drain on resources and time for merchants, dragging the process out and incurring further costs.
Not only are there process issues associated with chargeback fraud, but there is also the loss of goods/services. Merchants frequently do not recover the lost (or stolen) goods or services and associated shipping costs from a fraudulent chargeback. In addition to this physical loss, there is also the brand and customer loyalty damage that merchants must manage.
Consumers have low tolerance for a lengthy dispute process and are quick to abandon merchants. Highly sensitive fraud controls can trigger a false positive, resulting in declines for legitimate purchases. By the time this problem is discovered, the consumer is long gone.
Resolving the process
Most merchants would agree that the chargeback process is outdated and inefficient. However, they may not know that they have the power to make substantial changes that will reduce disputes and associated costs.
As with resolving most issues, this starts with drilling down to find the real source of pain points for businesses. This will allow merchants to identify how chargebacks are hurting their business and then work with their customer service team, issuers, and customers to create an open and collaborative environment to resolve disputes efficiently.
The benefits of collaboration between merchants, issuers, and consumers can be significant. When the right party has the right information about a transaction at the right time, a dispute can be resolved before it becomes a chargeback. When that happens, everyone wins.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Boris Bialek Vice President and Field CTO, Industry Solutions at MongoDB
11 December
Kathiravan Rajendran Associate Director of Marketing Operations at Macro Global
10 December
Barley Laing UK Managing Director at Melissa
Scott Dawson CEO at DECTA
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.