12 December 2017
Enrico Camerinelli

Enrico Camerinelli

Enrico Camerinelli - Aite Group

58Posts 456,986Views 63Comments
Finextra community

Treasury Management

This network brings together treasury and financial professionals who manage treasury functions. Members share a common interest in treasury, cash management, banking, risk management and investments.

Treasury Management Systems Beyond 2015

13 December 2014  |  4941 views  |  0

The treasury management systems (TMS) business is in a constant state of flux – what is top priority today may be outdated tomorrow. Although this change can be very difficult to predict I took the risk of anticipating the most relevant trends I see for 2015 and in the incoming years (*).


Trend 1: One-Stop-Shop

At a global level, treasurers are elevating the status of their function to become the strategic advisor of the company’s chief finance officer. At the same time, though, treasury must work to find and supply the company with the necessary financial “fuel” to ensure the execution of daily operations and “keep the lights on”. With the use of dedicated information technology solutions — i.e., TMS — treasury departments are able to fulfill their responsibility in a fast and informed way. Treasury offices across the world use treasury management systems to replace and automate manually executed cash management, reporting, liquidity management, and cash forecasting operations. While a TMS can be defined as a treasurer’s enterprise information system, such a system proved insufficient to support treasurers during the financial (and now, economical) crisis. Because company decisions must include a thorough overview of data and information, new forms of software applications are needed for treasury. Corporate treasurers seek central enterprise systems that go beyond operations execution to assist them in their decisions. Treasury management systems are becoming more relevant for decision making and thus, as decision supporting systems, it is important that they gather and integrate more data than ever before. TMS need to sit side by side to ERP systems, so that it helps treasury to collect all relevant data. Having all of these data – e.g., purchase and sales orders, inventory turns, invoice matching and reconciliation data– available and visible, it is easier to make appropriate decisions.

So this will be a challenge for a TMS to integrate a maximum amount of data and interact with more and more platforms or interfaces.


Trend 2: Making treasury processes simple

Corporate treasurers today seek simplification, operational efficiency, and standardized processes and technologies, and uncertain economic conditions are leading many corporations to increase their focus on internal efficiencies and cost reduction. The corporate treasury management systems market is characterized by fierce price competition on well-established functionalities for basic bank accounting, cash and liquidity management, reporting, and risk management. This competition is further intensified by the presence of providers of free accounting, tax, payments, banking, and other services.

Corporate treasurers are seeking information systems that support treasury management operations that are simple and easy to use. Treasury offices are being shrunk down to small teams and – in order to reduce costs by automating processes – they are only getting smaller. The rush for rapid growth and cross-border expansion often conflicts with lack of talent management and properly skilled resources in companies with smaller treasury teams and with less sophisticated international finance experience. So treasury management systems need to provide the necessary intelligence to really help the treasurer make the right decisions. I think this a very important trend for treasury management systems to be user friendly and be able to provide valid data to help decision making processes in more convenient ways.


Trend 3: The 30/70 rule

I believe that what corporate users want from a TMS is 30% of new software functions and 70% of advisory and best practice.


Trend 4: Deconstructing payment flows

A payment is not always just “a payment”. Beyond the pure financial settlement of a contractually agreed due, a payment transaction may carry information related to the processes of the value chain that have made the goods or services available throughout the entire value chain, from the first supplier to the end customer. Modernly engineered TMS must support treasurers in managing not just the issuance of payments instructions per se but they must help capture, for instance, data related to the processes (e.g., date of production, date of shipment, quality inspection results) and the corresponding data fields of an invoice that was sent electronically to the client. This simple step moves the TMS up the value chain, from the payment back to the item that originated the payment, i.e., the invoice. In the not so distant future (i.e., 3 years) I expect treasury systems will move even further up the chain, incorporating the processes that anticipate the invoice, such as supplier sourcing, request for proposals, supplier selection, contract management, and purchase order execution.

Payments are no longer just a “black box” that needs to be made faster and simpler – of course this is also important.

But treasurers will need systems able to identify the so-called “trigger points” that are part of the lifecycle of a payment transaction, providing the necessary supporting services such as foreign exchange (FX) services, order matching and reconciliation, reporting, trade finance – all typical solutions that were not part of a treasurers responsibility before, but now become more and more important in the near future.


(*)This article was first published in Bellin’s magazine Treasury Connected #4



Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Enrico

Supply Chain Collaboration: Why Banks Should Care

23 June 2017  |  22389 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsInnovationTransaction bankingGroupInnovation in Financial Services

Applying Blockchain in the Supply Chain

06 June 2017  |  7387 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsBlockchainInnovationGroupFinancial Supply Chain

R3 vs Blockchain: Possible Consequences

07 March 2017  |  9595 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsBlockchainInnovationGroupInnovation in Financial Services

Killer Corporate Banking Use Cases for Fintech

22 February 2017  |  38538 views  |  2 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsWholesale bankingTransaction bankingGroupTransaction Banking

APIs for Transaction Banking

30 January 2017  |  8264 views  |  2 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsInnovationTransaction bankingGroupTransaction Banking

Enrico's profile

job title sr. analyst
location Boston
member since 2009
Summary profile See full profile »
Senior Analyst for Corporate Banking, based in Europe. Current research focuses on Global Transaction Banking, Supply Chain Finance and Working Capital Management.

Enrico's expertise

Member since 2008
53 posts63 comments
What Enrico reads

Who's commenting on Enrico's posts

João Bohner
Roberto Garavaglia
Lucile Mathe