Community
At the end of March 2014, regulators will be collecting the first annual Dodd-Frank stress test results from banks in the $10-50billion bracket. From Q2 onwards, these banks will have the opportunity to improve upon their stress testing processes by incorporating regulatory feedback and industry best practices. The next round of Dodd-Frank stress test scenarios are then expected to be released by 15 November 2014, with public disclosures of stress test results being a requirement starting in 2015.
The fall out of the stress tests will not only be a simple failure certification and capital plan rejection issued by the regulator. The real penalty will be the publicity of the failing and the associated reputational risks that can weigh down a bank’s business. While this may be a time of industry speculation as we await the results, there are some interesting observations of how the results could fuel evolution of risk management in the US financial market:
Pasta or Lasagne?
Different banks have been tackling stress testing in many ways according to size, complexity, balance sheet structure, and geographical footprint. However, the one thing they all have in common is the need to reduce the complexity of their operational and technology infrastructure. Let’s use the analogy of pasta and lasagne to illustrate. Currently, banks are making big bowls of pasta when it comes to their data and solution set-up – there are many different silos of information all intertwined yet separate. In order to succeed in stress testing, these banks need to be applying a lasagne-based model to break down these silos and introduce a more layered structure within the bank to help generate a holistic view of risk exposures across the entire organisation’s balance sheet. As part of this, we expect more and more banks to set up or expand the roles of in-house enterprise risk committees, which work to forge collaboration across the organisation.
Cultural shift
While bankers are aware that this is the right approach and an important part of re-engineering risk management to embed stress testing into their organisation, many are still in aspirational mode and recognize that this will be an evolutionary process that will take more time to achieve. A lot of work needs to be done to achieve this holistic view: vast amounts of internal data will need to be collected and standardized, technology solutions will need to be integrated, and sophisticated analytical models will need to be developed. All of this needs to be underpinned by a formalized governance structure to oversee all the processes and models.
Changing attitudes
Many banks are still viewing stress testing as a regulatory burden but whether they like it or not, it’s not going anywhere fast. It’s understandable that they are feeling the burn, particularly when it comes to resource and time commitment. The industry needs to work towards automating these stress tests so less time has to be spent on generating and validating the results and more time can be placed on drawing insights from the results, such as informing capital plans. This will be incremental in helping achieve a more forward looking view of risk for the organisation, thus helping the bank make better-informed decisions to drive competitive advantage through regulatory compliance. We anticipate a mind shift among banks to begin to view stress testing more opportunistically rather than being a regulatory weight around their necks.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Boris Bialek Vice President and Field CTO, Industry Solutions at MongoDB
11 December
Kathiravan Rajendran Associate Director of Marketing Operations at Macro Global
10 December
Barley Laing UK Managing Director at Melissa
Scott Dawson CEO at DECTA
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.