Join the Community

24,134
Expert opinions
40,682
Total members
332
New members (last 30 days)
206
New opinions (last 30 days)
29,290
Total comments

Does the new SEPA deadline really change anything?

You may have seen the big news today that the European Commission has announced a proposed extension to the SEPA migration deadline of six months, from 1st February to 1st August.  Their view is that the rates of adoption are not high enough to guarantee a smooth transition.  According to the latest migration stats available, credit transfer adoption is at 64.1% and direct debits at 26% (November 2013 figures).  Considering that in September, the direct debits migration figure was only at 5%, this was a big jump.  But obviously not enough to make the commission comfortable enough to stick with the Feb 1st date and force the change through.

Throughout 2013 it always looked like a very tall order to reach 100% (or even close to 100%) compliance across credit transfers and direct debits, with the problem being especially acute for SMEs.  But the commission was always firm that the date wouldn’t move.  Most of us assumed that other measures might be put in place including punitive costs.  So, whilst the adoption rates do not come as a surprise (actually, the recent increases have been more positive than one might expect), the announcement has been a surprise.

Corporations have been given some breathing space to become compliant and for some it will definitely have come as a welcome relief.  But, apart from the date, nothing else changes.  The migration to pan-European payment and direct debit instruments will happen and the potential benefits from embarking on payments centralisation across the Eurozone remain the same for large corporates.  Corporations can still look towards a SEPA migration project  as a catalyst for a wider payments centralisation project to take advantage of the opportunity to reduce costs while standardising processes.  You may be thinking that if the EC have moved the date once, they will move it again.  But for now, they seem very firm on the point that this is a one-time shift.

External

This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.

Join the Community

24,134
Expert opinions
40,682
Total members
332
New members (last 30 days)
206
New opinions (last 30 days)
29,290
Total comments

Trending

Mete Feridun

Mete Feridun Chair at EMU Centre for Financial Regulation and Risk

The Crypto Crash: A Stress Test for Global Financial Stability

Alex Kreger

Alex Kreger Founder and CEO at UXDA Financial UX Design

From Inside-Out to Outside-In: Why UX Now Underpins Future Banking

Robert Kraal

Robert Kraal Co-founder and CBDO at Silverflow

What Do Merchants Really Want from Payments Technology?

Now Hiring