17 March 2018
Dan Barnes


Dan Barnes - Information Corporation

47Posts 89,824Views 8Comments
Future Finance

Future Finance

Finextra and Oracle have gathered together some of the industry's top thought leaders to discuss, debate and analyse the key trends and issues within transaction banking, regulations and retail banking. This group will focus on upcoming regulations, new service offerings and industry debate shaping the new financial services landscape with regular blog posts, video interviews, webcasts debates and surveys.

Unlicensed premises

05 December 2013  |  1794 views  |  0

It must be hard trying to start out in the world of banking. There are all of these massive competitors, hoovering up business, and there is no way to match their scale. Without scale, you cannot pay the same level of wages, you cannot offer the same breadth of services and you cannot reach as many customers.

What could be done? Well, regulators could think about taking banks licenses away for a start. That might create opportunities for new players to step into the breach and offer services that the bigger banks are prohibited from performing.

There is plenty precedent of precedent for banning firms. For example, Citi had its private banking operations shut down in Japan in 2004 for breaking the rules, and later had its retail bank sales function shut down for a month in 2009 because it hadn't updated customer screening technology for five years.

A ban on a bank’s activities keeps them sharp because the interconnected nature of banking means losing one business function can impact lots of others. Whereas a fine has NO impact.

Where is the evidence for this? Well, JP Morgan reached a US$13 billion settlement with the US government over bad mortgage deals recently and, as an excellent article in Fortune recently pointed out, the people in charge are still very much in charge. They must be kicking themselves about how bad that fine hurt them.

This week the European Commission announced the fines it was levying against firms participating in Japanese and European interest rate derivatives cartels, totalling €1.7 billion.

Fines again. What does a bank have to do to lose its license? If you can be found to deliberately be engaging in a cartel and you are still considered OK to run a business, when would you not be?

If a pub served drink to underage drinkers, it could have its license taken away. If a shop did not have adequate fire escape access, it could be shut down.

If either was found to be acting deliberately, there would be no doubt.

Will banks improve if they don’t face similar punishments? No. Will new, better behaved firms be able to break into the market if the firms found guilty of immoral behaviour are not removed from their positions? No.

So regulators, what is it to be? An orderly, competitive market, or business as usual?

TagsRisk & regulation

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Dan

Google search: What’s my credit score?

01 July 2014  |  2805 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationInnovationGroupFuture Finance

Trade finance creates a 10 billion dollar risk

11 June 2014  |  2476 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationWholesale bankingGroupFuture Finance News Analysis

Bad as gold

29 May 2014  |  2733 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsRisk & regulationWholesale bankingGroupFuture Finance News Analysis

Is Bitcoin mo' money or no money?

29 May 2014  |  2222 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsBlockchainRisk & regulationGroupFuture Finance

Dan's profile

job title Writer
location London
member since 2013
Summary profile See full profile »
Award-winning, freelance financial journalist. Specialist in many areas, including; sell-side execution services, buy-side trading, market infrastructure, emerging markets, regulation, wholesale banki...

Dan's expertise

Member since 2013
47 posts8 comments
What Dan reads
Dan's blog archive
2014 (22)2013 (25)

Who's commenting on Dan's posts