20 August 2017
Dan Barnes

67447

Dan Barnes - Information Corporation

47Posts 85,313Views 8Comments
Future Finance

Future Finance

Finextra and Oracle have gathered together some of the industry's top thought leaders to discuss, debate and analyse the key trends and issues within transaction banking, regulations and retail banking. This group will focus on upcoming regulations, new service offerings and industry debate shaping the new financial services landscape with regular blog posts, video interviews, webcasts debates and surveys.

Start of a recovery process

29 July 2013  |  1713 views  |  0

The announcement on 26 June 2013 that a single European regime for bankrupt banks, the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), has been proposed, is demonstrative of the challenge that Europe faces in delivering new rules. It is clearly behind the US in terms of pace.

The US regime was set out in 2010 as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act. Having recently been named as systemically important financial institutions (SIFI) by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), a division of the US Treasury, even non-banks like insurer AIG and GE Capital will now have to hold additional capital reserves as buffers, and must provide resolution plans called ‘living wills’ to the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) every year. These must detail the company's strategy for a “rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure of the company.”

For banks of over US$250billion in assets, the US regime had been enforced since 1 July 2012; for those of between US$100 billion and US$250 billion it was 1 July 2013. Clearly the challenge for getting rules in place is not uniquely European as Tim Geithner, US treasury secretary, had singled out both AIG and GE out as SIFIs in 2010 but they have not been formally designated until now.

Although individual European countries have established systems for tying up banks, for example the UK set up a Special Resolution Regime under the Banking Act of 2009, for Europe to provide confidence in its capital markets for investors, it must demonstrate that it has established a consistent and reliable safety net.

The European plan still has some way to go before it is enshrined in the rulebook. The BRRD may be contentious – it is moving the lender of last resort away from being central banks and on to the commercial banks without explicitly saying so – but knowing Europe can put rules in place in a timely manner will create a sense of confidence, as much as the rules themselves.

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Dan

Google search: What’s my credit score?

01 July 2014  |  2657 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationInnovationGroupFuture Finance

Trade finance creates a 10 billion dollar risk

11 June 2014  |  2332 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationWholesale bankingGroupFuture Finance News Analysis

Bad as gold

29 May 2014  |  2536 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsRisk & regulationWholesale bankingGroupFuture Finance News Analysis

Is Bitcoin mo' money or no money?

29 May 2014  |  2066 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsBlockchainRisk & regulationGroupFuture Finance

Dan's profile

job title Writer
location London
member since 2013
Summary profile See full profile »
Award-winning, freelance financial journalist. Specialist in many areas, including; sell-side execution services, buy-side trading, market infrastructure, emerging markets, regulation, wholesale banki...

Dan's expertise

Member since 2013
47 posts8 comments
What Dan reads
Dan's blog archive
2014 (22)2013 (25)

Who's commenting on Dan's posts