22 March 2018
Bradd Lewis


Bradd Lewis - Dell EMC

5Posts 23,466Views 0Comments
Innovation in Financial Services

Innovation in Financial Services

A discussion of trends in innovation management within financial institutions, and the key processes, technology and cultural shifts driving innovation.

Successful transformation requires a dictatorship

15 March 2017  |  5286 views  |  2

When it comes to digitally transforming, the financial services sector is suffering from the old saying ‘too many cooks spoil the broth’. Much needed innovation and change is being held back because there are simply too many people involved in making decisions around new technology. As more and more startups enter the market, challenging norms and fundamentally changing services, processes and expectations, financial service organisations cannot afford to evolve at their current pace. The industry needs to re-think it’s approach to IT management; re-engineering the decision-making process so that it is more of a dictatorship than a democracy.

This might sound backwards or even a little extreme but there is a reason that the CIO role was introduced and has flourished since. Until recently, financial services organisations worked in multiple technology siloes that existed across teams, countries and regions. This structure worked until cloud platforms and automation were born, requiring these siloes to work together. With technology moving faster than people, organisations are still playing catch up and I don’t think any would be able to confidently claim to having one clear picture of the various technologies within their business. Having one central group overseeing how the different elements work together is therefore vital if organisations are going to evolve their technology environment.

And evolve they must, as the heritage environments that financial services organisations have been building over the past 25 years are being challenged by the increasing move to a more cloud-based environment and automated approach. Automating processes is a huge change for the industry, which is why it is so important to have clear direction and leadership from the top. There are different ways of approaching the change so it’s important that whichever route each organisation chooses to take, it’s consistent throughout. For example, you could approach automation from a ‘if you’re automating anything that’s good’ angle. Similar to how security teams approach a task or challenge, trying out the technology even if it means failure, is a learning curve and people will therefore learn quicker. The other approach is to be very targeted with what is automated. A big benefit of automation is the cost saving element so automating everything, even the elements that aren’t business imperative, could save time and money. Evaluating how to approach automation right from the beginning is important and needs to be centrally driven.

It’s also important to remember however that any change within a business, whether it’s big or small, impacts people and culture as well as processes and systems. Often, organisations forget that, for a digital project to work successfully, they must get people bought into the technology. Introducing new technology is as much about managing people as managing the implementation. The majority of organisations that bypass consulting and training employees more often than not don’t see the benefits that they expect.

This is particularly relevant in the financial services industry which still relies on legacy mainframe technology. Many in the IT teams have skills associated with these legacy environments and are often sceptical or resistant to any new technology. It is the organisation’s responsibility to ensure that employees are given the opportunities to upskill themselves for new solutions so that they don’t get left behind in the move to a more digital era. On the flip side, those with the skills in managing mainframes are getting older and it won’t be long until we lose them from the workplace through retirement. In an ideal world, financial services will have moved away from mainframes by that point but if not, they need to ensure that the necessary skills are still present within the business.

Change is disruptive and if managed badly, with little direction and leadership, can leave a sour taste. Now is the time for the financial services industry to ensure that the necessary leadership is in place to ensure that it can really see the benefits that technology can provide.



TagsInnovationFinancial inclusion

Comments: (2)

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 15 March, 2017, 19:08

Totally agree. I'd add that it'd help if it was a benevolent dictator. In some ways, entrusting systems to PaaS providers is a move in this direction. The way Amazon, Google et al behave, sometimes you wonder if they're dictators.

On a side note, when I read your line "In an ideal world, financial services will have moved away from mainframes by that point but if not, they need to ensure that the necessary skills are still present within the business.", I was reminded of the opening paragraph of my blog post 6 Reasons Why Banks Can't Transform Legacy Applications 

"During a meeting with the CIO of a Top 5 bank in Germany, I was introduced to a lady who was retiring that same weekend. The CIO averred that she was the last employee in the bank's IT department who knew the nitty-gritty of a certain mainframe application."

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
João Bohner
João Bohner - Independent Consultant - Carapicuiba | 16 March, 2017, 13:42

Very clever article, Bradd.

And a good job description for the Dictator you'll find in the Bhavesh Vaghela blog:


In my opinion it's not a Bank's task to transform/replace old legacies, nor Fintechs Startups task.

This burden is in the hands of technology vendors whom should invest in solution for the Banking Business.

The technology vendors, they have the power to handle this market as @Ketharaman Swaminathan mentioned in a previous blog:

           "However, that would be turning a blind eye to how technology vendors have thwarted the change to the status quo.

I know it's a daring task, so much so that the innovator Elon Musk has given up on disrupt banking, preferring simpler tasks such as colonizing Mars!


I've some concrete ideas on the matter and I'm open to share them.


Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Bradd

Breaking out of the Henry T Ford approach to FS infrastructure

24 March 2017  |  3688 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsInnovationGroupBanking Architecture

Successful transformation requires a dictatorship

15 March 2017  |  5286 views  |  2 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsInnovationFinancial inclusionGroupInnovation in Financial Services

How to get the best out of your IT? Run it like a business

18 November 2016  |  4524 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlineInnovation

How quickly can banks move towards the digital agenda?

08 November 2016  |  3479 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlineInnovation

First steps for financial services in cloud implementation

07 October 2016  |  6490 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurityRisk & regulation

Bradd's profile

job title MD & Global Lead,Financial Services Transformation
location London
member since 2016
Summary profile See full profile »

Bradd's expertise

Member since 2016
5 posts0 comments
What Bradd reads
Bradd's blog archive
2017 (2)2016 (3)

Who's commenting on Bradd's posts