Community
To achieve MiFID II’s aim of greater transparency, having a proper golden source of instrument data is key for every market participant. Fortunately, under the new rules, ESMA is required to publish a list of all financial instruments traded on all trading venues and systematic internalisers, enriched with useful, related information such as MiFIR transparency and liquidity thresholds. ESMA is always keen to point out that this should not be seen as the golden source. The trouble is, almost everyone else in the market is left wondering, if this isn’t it, then what is?
But whether it’s truly golden or merely gilded it’s somewhat irrelevant if ESMA doesn’t move forward soon. Since the announcement of centralised data projects for MiFIR and EMIR in April 2015 ESMA has made no further public statements. This is rather worrying, given that nearly every MiFID II requirement, be it around transaction and trade reporting, record-keeping, or something else, somehow links back to instrument data.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Ritesh Jain Founder at Infynit / Former COO HSBC
08 January
Steve Haley Director of Market Development and Partnerships at Mojaloop Foundation
07 January
Nkahiseng Ralepeli VP of Product: Digital Assets at Absa Bank, CIB.
Sergiy Fitsak Managing Director, Fintech Expert at Softjourn
06 January
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.