24 October 2017
Duena Blomstrom
Duena Blomstrom

Duena Blomstrom

Duena Blomstrom - Duena Blomstrom Consulting

26Posts 81,843Views 5Comments

FinTechS - What's in a name?

14 July 2015  |  1683 views  |  0

A while ago on Twitter I confessed the term "FinTechS" irks me. The plural. It's a new phenomenon and maybe we are just using it to be hipsterishly "in" but there is something about it that grates me to no end. 

Instinctively it seemed derogatory, too broad, condescending and in the middle of the Great Digital Debate we didn't need new levels of non-discourse. 

It's finally dawned on me why that is - leaving all grammar considerations aside (it's an adjective not a noun, people!) it paints every type of enterprise offering anything in the Financial Services sphere that is not a bank with the same utterly broad stroke and boy, that is so very wrong! 

To be fair this is because to most, it means "startups who challenge the status quo of banks" - so while that is the case for Challenger Banks and Neo Banks it's also the case for what I call "Alternative Banking Experiences" - Lending, Payments, etc

Others feel strongly about the logical definition "any company that provides technology for the financial industry" - and that is accurate and in terms of size, dwarfs the startup scene.

Some even think of it to reflect a state of how nimble in thought and execution an organisation is and thus some banks may make the cut as well.

To me there's a distinction missing to clarify the confusion "Enabling" or "Competing" - is this technology creator, regardless of their size and how they were created (incidentally Wikipedia's definition here is reminding us that it is, after all, crowdsourced knowledge and you can see who wrote it when it mentions disruption in my opinion), intending to enhance, change and better or to challenge and provide an alternative? 

Our industry is starting to suffer greatly from the incessant noise, the -some times purpose-built- confusion in terms and the lack of definitions so it's important we have it crystal clear what we DO we mean when we say FinTech because it oughtn't be muddy.

This is not intended as a decree but a conversation starter so riddle me these:

Do we need the Enabling vs Competing distinction?

Does size play a role into it?

Can an incumbent bank be "a" FinTech?

Does it matter what the FinTech's DNA is?

Does the term inherently include disruption?

Will it exist in 10-15 years? 

 

TagsRetail bankingStart ups

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Duena

NatWest - our Love Hate Relationship

20 October 2017  |  2641 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlinePayments

Goodbye, Santander! The end of a banking love affair

19 October 2016  |  10614 views  |  13 comments | recomends Recommends 8 TagsMobile & onlineRetail banking

Breaking news: Experts say you can save instead of spending!

26 July 2016  |  3308 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlineRetail banking

Spenders and Savers

18 July 2016  |  3989 views  |  2 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsPaymentsRetail banking

Emotional Banking Crusade Revelations: Bankers

27 June 2016  |  2218 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsBlockchainInnovationBrexit

Duena's profile

job title Knower
location London
member since 2015
Summary profile See full profile »
I am an independent Digital Banking consultant, an entrepreneur, a mentor for Startupbootcamp and Techstars, an uncomfortably opinionated blogger, a public speaker at industry events, the mother of a...

Duena's expertise

Member since 2015
25 posts5 comments
What Duena reads

Who's commenting on Duena's posts