21 July 2018
Ketharaman Swaminathan

Talk of Many Things

Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions

99Posts 668,879Views 3,072Comments

How To Lie With Big Data

18 December 2014  |  5674 views  |  1

Darrell Huff's classic How To Lie With Statistics is as relevant today as it was when it was published 60 years ago. Probably even more relevant now because, as more data has been generated in the last three years than in the entire history of mankind, there's so much more raw material for lying now than ever before.

Whether it's statistics or big data, the goal of lying is still the same: Draw a favorable conclusion by ignoring unfavorable alternatives.

Let's take a few examples of fooling around with data to see how the lying techniques have evolved.   

#1. Faux Data

"I polled my 1000+ LinkedIn Connections to ask them whether they preferred fingerprint or password to access their Mobile Banking app. 80% of respondents voted in favor of Fingerprint."

It's intuitively clear that people will prefer the convenience of a fingerprint over the pain of entering a long password on the virtual keyboard of a smartphone. That said, we crave data before agreeing or disagreeing with anything. This statement slakes our thirst for numbers, so we readily give it the thumbs up.

There's only problem: The aforementioned statement implies that 800 people voted for fingerprint.  That's totally wrong, as you can see by looking up the actual figures here.

This technique works by using verbal sleight-of-hand. In this example, the wordplay is on the word "respondents".

#2. Strategic Silence

"Sixty-two percent of consumers expect live chat to be available on mobile devices, and 82% would use it."

I read this in the following tweet by @rshevlin. 

https://twitter.com/rshevlin/status/522021652780302336

I agree with @rshevlin: "Nonsense. 62% of ppl don't know what live chat is".

If you probe deeper, you might find the truth unraveling as follows: "62% of shoppers who know about live chat want it on mobile devices". Considering that not more than 20% of consumers are likely to know about live chat, the above finding would translate to:

"12% of shoppers want live chat with brands on mobile devices".

(12% being 20% of 62%).

This won't help someone trying to sell mobile live chat. Hence the "strategic silence" on details.

#3. Exploiting Calculitis

"A growing digital advertising market has also seen increased adoption among B2B marketers."

Blogger Poornima Mohandas waxes eloquently about the popularity of PPC ads in B2B in her post “How to Create PPC Ads That Close Sales”.

Unfortunately, according to data, only 15% of B2B marketers agree with her conclusion. Which is disastrous for the author's obvious attempt to plug her white paper about PPC in her blog post.

So what happens?

We see the premise broken into two parts:

  1. Percentage of B2B marketers who use PPC: 48%
  2. Percentage of them who find PPC very effective: 32%.

Now, for somebody to like PPC, they need to have used it and found it effective. That figure works out to 48% of 32% i.e. 15.36%. In other words, a vast majority of over 84% of B2B marketers don’t like PPC ads.

But many readers afflicted by “calculitis” - the fear of using a calculator - might see the two percentages in isolation and say to themselves, "Wow, PPC is widely used" or "Hmm, PPC seems quite effective".

And you don't expect an author pitching a white paper on PPC to rush to correct that impression, do you?

*****

I could go on and on with many more examples but they'd all prove the same thing: The techniques for lying with data are still crude.

While data has grown by leaps and bounds in the last 60 years, the tricks to lie with it haven't kept pace.

I leave it to you to decide whether that's a good or bad thing.

a member-uploaded image

Comments: (1)

Aparty Behera
Aparty Behera - ORACLE - PUNE 22 December, 2014, 07:19

This is applicable to all analytics, it goes by the old saying "Garbage in Garbage out". The quality of data sample, size etc are the factors that give the output. But it does not indicate that something wrong with the tools.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups!
Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Ketharaman

Beware Of Committing Harakiri By Lying With Big Data

16 July 2018  |  4710 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsRetail banking

How Blockchain Can Crack The Holy Grail Of Loyalty Programs

05 June 2018  |  8903 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 2 TagsBlockchainRetail banking

PSA: Insist On Receipt When You Pay By NEFT And FPS

18 May 2018  |  8647 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsRetail banking

Open Banking Needs A Blockchain Boost

02 May 2018  |  13009 views  |  2 comments | recomends Recommends 2 TagsBlockchainRetail banking

When Will Fintechs Sell What Consumers Want To Buy?

01 April 2018  |  11287 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsCardsRetail banking

Ketharaman's profile

job title Founder and CEO
location Pune
member since 2009
Summary profile See full profile »
As Founder and CEO, S. Ketharaman provides overall direction and leadership toward setting and achievement of GTM360's goals and objectives.

Ketharaman's expertise

Member since 2009
90 posts3,072 comments
What Ketharaman reads

Who's commenting on Ketharaman's posts

David Godfrey
Adrian Black
Ramdas Narayanan
Shaju Nair
Christoph Mussenbrock
Mike Ray
James Piggot
Charmaine Oak
Dharmesh Mistry