21 October 2017
Steve Grob

Fidessa Fragmentation Index

Steve Grob - Fidessa

137Posts 529,564Views 3Comments

National interest or political self-interest?

06 April 2011  |  3200 views  |  1

Few can have missed the announcement that the proposed merger between ASX and SGX is about to be halted by Wayne Swan, Australia’s Treasurer. He cites the deal as contrary to the national interest which, of course, has been a concern raised by the Canadian authorities in their review of the proposed merger between their own TMX Group and the London Stock Exchange.

I wonder if it’s complete coincidence that both Australia and Canada are in particularly sensitive political waters right now. The Australian legislature effectively suffers from a hung parliament and Canada faces close elections too. The challenge for the politicians then is that for the man on the street these deals do look like a sell-off of national assets and so there is little political capital to be gained by approving them. On the other hand, a look at the reduction in the domestic shares of the LSE or TMX tells another story. ASX, too, will face competition from Chi-X later this year and so all these venues run the risk of being increasingly marginalised. Now is the time for these exchanges to bulk up and form global alliances as it’s unlikely they will reverse their domestic fortunes. The concept of a national stock exchange may fast become a quaint anachronism as capital markets continue to globalise at an ever-faster rate.

When the financial regulators of these countries first introduced their domestic exchanges to the concept of competition, they should have understood that the current wave of mergers was going to be an inevitable consequence. Why should stock exchanges be any different from airlines, automobiles or pharmaceuticals which have all globalised to meet the practical realities of their industries?

TagsTrade execution

Comments: (2)

A Finextra member
A Finextra member | 07 April, 2011, 19:47

Hi Steve


I make you dead right on this. History will show this as just a moment in time as natural selection dictates global structure. I still think the main Stock Exchanges will dominate but regionally. Not sure there is much of a future for MTFs long term

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Steve Grob
Steve Grob - Fidessa - London | 12 April, 2011, 15:50

Thanks for your comment Gary. I agree that the big exchange groups will dominate but think there’s still a viable role for the niche MTF players – I covered this subject in more detail a recent video blog http://fragmentation.fidessa.com/2011/03/01/feeding-frenzy/

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Steve

Why you’ll never be ready for MiFID II

12 September 2017  |  4677 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionRisk & regulation

So that's nice and clear...

31 August 2017  |  5327 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionRisk & regulation

Relocation, Relocation, Relocation

14 June 2017  |  5688 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionRisk & regulation

MiFID II - the best thing that ever happened?

08 June 2017  |  8711 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionRisk & regulation

Be careful what you wish for

26 April 2017  |  5413 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionRisk & regulationGroupMiFID

Steve's profile

job title Director of Group Strategy
location London
member since 2009
Summary profile See full profile »
I am responsible for strategic development at Fidessa. This includes the development of new geographic markets and strategic partnerships and driving new industry initiatives. As part of this I head u...

Steve's expertise

Member since 2004
130 posts3 comments
What Steve reads

Who's commenting on Steve's posts