12 December 2017
Wendell Brock
Wendell Brock

Wendell Brock

Wendell Brock - Outside Investment Advisors

11Posts 24,442Views 0Comments

Quarterly Banking Profile Shows Industry Loss

01 September 2009  |  1929 views  |  0

Quarterly Banking Profile Shows Industry Loss on Continuing Problems with Toxic Assets

 After a small profit rebound in the first quarter of 2009, insured banking institutions recorded another aggregate net loss in the second quarter. The $3.7 billion loss was primarily related to sharply increased loan-loss provisions, write-downs of asset-backed commercial paper, and increased deposit insurance assessments. The commercial paper write-downs contributed to a $3.3 billion increase in extraordinary losses. And, higher deposit insurance comprised a good part of the industry’s $1.7 billion increase in non-interest expenses.

More than 28 percent of insured institutions recorded a second quarter loss; in the year-ago period, 18 percent were unprofitable.

 Bright spots: noninterest income, NIM

Some banks partially offset the rash of higher expenses with improved net interest margins (NIM) and higher noninterest income. The average NIM rose 9 basis points to 3.48 percent, and larger banks were the primary recipients of this improvement. Noninterest income increased by 10.6 percent or $6.5 billion. Other positives included reduced realized losses on securities, higher gains on assets sales, higher servicing fees and improved trading revenues.

Records set: net charge-offs, noncurrent loan rate

Net charge-offs spiked to $48.9 billion in the second quarter, sending the net charge-off rate to a record 2.55 percent. In dollars, charge-offs rose more than 85 percent from the second quarter of last year. Commercial and industrial loans (C&I) and credit card loans were the categories with the largest charged-off amounts in the second quarter.

Noncurrent loans and leases rose 14.3 percent, marking a thirteenth consecutive quarterly increase. The increase was driven by 1-4 family residential mortgages, real estate construction and development loans, and loans backed by nonfarm, nonresidential real estate. The noncurrent loan rate rose to 4.35 percent, the highest level on record, despite a record decrease in loans 30-89 days past due. All major loan categories contributed to this decrease, with real estate loans accounting for 83.5 percent of the improvement.

Capital improves, assets decline

Equity capital grew to 10.56 percent, its highest level since the spring of 2007. On average, capital ratios improved, although this improvement was concentrated in fewer than half of the insured institutions.

While 57 percent of insured institution increased their assets in the quarter, the industry average showed an asset decline of 1.8 percent. More than half of the decline was related to loans and leases. C&I loan balances were down, as were 1-4 family residential mortgages, and real estate construction and development loans. Small business loan balances also declined industry-wide.

Problem list

The FDIC’s problem list now includes 416 institutions, making it the largest problem list since 1994. Twenty-four institutions failed in the second quarter and thirty-nine were merged into other banks. Only twelve new charters were approved.

Insurance fund

At quarter-end, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on insured banks totaling 5 basis points of each institution’s assets less Tier 1 capital. Some 89 institutions with assets of $4 trillion were assessed 10 basis points of their second quarter assessment base.

During the second quarter, total deposits at insured institutions increased by 0.7 percent. Over the prior twelve months, total domestic deposits grew 7.5 percent. 

Brokered deposits exceeding 10 percent of a bank’s domestic deposits are now included in the FDIC’s assessment calculation. At quarter-end, 1488 banks had brokered deposits exceeding 10 percent of their domestic deposits. Aggregate brokered deposits decreased by 5.8 percent in the quarter.

The Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) declined 20.3 percent during the second quarter to $10.4 billion. Factors that reduced the fund balance included:

·         Increased loss provisions of $11.6 billion

·         Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities of $1.3 billion

Factors that increased the fund balance included:

·         Accrued assessment income, including the special assessment, of $9.1 billion

·         Interest earned, realized gains on securities, debt guarantee surcharges from TLGP of $1.1 billion

The DIF reserve ratio was 0.22 percent at quarter-end, vs. 1.01 percent at the end of last year’s second quarter.



Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Wendell

The New Cold War

21 October 2014  |  2002 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurity

Swiss Gold Opportunity

17 September 2014  |  2075 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsBlockchainRisk & regulation

Two Asset Crises, Two Resolutions

25 September 2009  |  2345 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

SNL Financial's De Novo Digest Article

17 September 2009  |  2055 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

Bank Purchase Basics: Top Ten Topics When Buying a Bank

17 September 2009  |  1968 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

Wendell's profile

job title Principal
location McKinney
member since 2008
Summary profile See full profile »
Wendell Brock is a principal at Outside Investment Advisors and is dedicated to developing a smart financial strategies that can help you build security and enhance life for you and those you care abo...

Wendell's expertise

Member since 2008
11 posts0 comments
Wendell's blog archive
2014 (2)2009 (5)2008 (4)

Who's commenting on Wendell's posts