Blog article
See all stories »

Could Norway’s Tight Substantial Shareholding Disclosure Window Cost It Investment

It is widely known that Norway has one of the tightest substantial shareholding disclosure windows among countries. While many countries allow for reporting of substantial shareholding within days of a threshold breach, Norway’s requirement is immediately.

What does immediately mean? According to Rulefinder, the online regulatory intelligence solution from  aosphere, LLP (an affiliate of Allen & Overy), immediately means: “Immediately for these purposes is the time it takes to aggregate the holdings and to prepare the notification. Trades taking place after close of the opening hours of the regulated market must be disclosed before the open of the trading hours of the next trading day.”

It appears now, that market participants are experiencing an even tighter window of reporting scrutiny – within the hour.  A few organizations I spoke with confirmed a similar experience. One firm’s counsel put it this way, “in practice disclosing after any more than one hour after crossing a disclosure threshold would likely attract sanctions for breaching the requirement to make immediate disclosure, unless there is a very good excuse not to do so.”

For beneficial ownership compliance professionals that have the responsibility to report their organizations substantial shareholdings to the regulators in the countries where they are invested this is a daunting task particularly if the organization does not have an automated solution. Even still, you need the eyeballs to continually monitor for the moment that a threshold is breached – no one has that kind of manpower.

We know that with tighter disclosing requirements, organizations try to proactively manage their disclosure obligation by actively monitoring their approaching thresholds, which usually results in less investment in that country. We’ve seen this with short selling obligations, with countries that have tough sanction/disclosure rules (China), and the question is, will we see this in Norway too?

3123

Comments: (2)

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 17 February, 2022, 08:16Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

This is the third decade of the 21st century. The technology is avalable to provide the information immediately, so what is the problem? The only reason for non-compliance is either a desire to keep the information from being disclosed or a lack of investment in technology.

Anna Monteiro
Anna Monteiro - www.solutions-atlantic.com - Boston 17 February, 2022, 21:55Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

While the technology is indeed available, there are several reasons why this is still a burden for many firms: they don’t have the technology (an OMS solution is not enough), they don’t have the manpower, they don’t have regulatory intelligence to know what is required, and/or their information is not in a central repository which makes aggregating the data more time consuming. For most firms, it is a combination of these.

Anna Monteiro

Anna Monteiro

Global Head of Business and Product Development

www.solutions-atlantic.com

Member since

18 Mar 2014

Location

Boston

Blog posts

22

Comments

1

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Financial Services Regulation

This network is for financial professionals interested in staying up to date on financial services regulation happening anywhere in the world. CFOs, bankers, fund managers, treasurers welcome.


See all

Now hiring