20 August 2017
Ian Sutherland

Smarter Change

Ian Sutherland - Kellian Consulting

7Posts 18,709Views 1Comments

Greek Musings

12 February 2015  |  2275 views  |  0

In most changes the "big picture" is good enough, but the devil is in the detail; that is where the problems come to light. It seems to me that in this case of breaking Greece out of the Euro there are serious problems in the "big picture", ones that will only compound in the detail.

The big question is how one draws a line around the assets and liabilities that will comprise the New Drachma?

When we created the Euro it was easy. ANY & EVERY asset and liability in each of the component currencies were converted. In this instance, just SOME of the Euro will be broken out. The key question is what and where?

Simple domestic Greek assets and liabilities are not the problem. It is the more international aspects that create the challenge. Imagine a Greek company that legitimately and reasonably took out a euro loan with a Belgian bank (I will avoid using Germany as the example) and then used it across its European operations, with the balance held in a head office account with a Greek bank in Athens.

It would seem that the portion in Athens is a no brainer, but what about assets in France that were funded by the loan? Similarly can one force the lending bank in Belgium to redenominate its loan to New Drachma, with all that could imply?

Unless we corral all the relevant assets and liabilities we will have an unbalanced set of accounts. So what do we do with the mismatch?

The only answer I have only come up with is not simple and could have some serious implications. I don't think that the EC will be able to issue rules that inherently create matched assets and liabilities in the New Drachma. This means that in keeping with the principles of double entry accounting there will need to be a sweep, a collection and consolidation of all the mismatched balances. This, I expect will have to be cumulative ie local banks reporting to their own central bank who then, I expect will need to work with the ECB. I expect that the ECB will have to absorb the full impact, taking the resultant exposure and providing corresponding compensation to the rest of the banking system.

Without this there could be considerable exposure in each regional (eg UK, US, etc) banking system. This would be unacceptable and create even more uncertainty and instability with each region trying to look after their own interests and exposed to the actions of speculators and hedge funds. This is not a recipe for financial stability.

Where any rules leave doubt or ambiguity I would expect enactors to take what they consider to be the most advantageous choice. I would expect the New Drachma to be pretty weak and that non-Greek banks will try and keep as many of their assets in Euros while converting their liabilities into New Drachmas.

Whatever happens it seems that identifying Greek domicile will be critical. For the banks this will hinge upon the static data held for clients, instruments and accounts. Now we know how notoriously inconsistent that data is. We spent months cleansing the data before creating the Euro, but we will not have the same run up here.

I know that a number of Banks are already in data clean up mode for KYC (know your customer) requirements, but expect it to take years. I am also aware of many debates around identifying the country of issue for a number of instruments , especially for larger supranational organisations.

Now while the first point still means I don't think we know the boundaries, I think it is clear that there needs to be an urgent focus on everything that looks as if it could be "Greek" and ensuring that the data held is as correct and consistent as possible. That way when the apparently inevitable happens one can at least have a reasonable set of data to work with.

Now I am not economist and I have to admit that I have not worked this all out and have no idea of the scale, but instinctively I believe I am on the right track.

This could be a very interesting and difficult ride. I just hope bigger brains that mine are thinking about this and can come up with a better solution.

 

TagsRisk & regulation

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Ian

Practice Makes Perfect?

23 February 2015  |  2124 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsInnovation

Why Financial Services Executives Should be Be Afraid, Very Afraid

20 February 2015  |  3176 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulation

Are you tackling the real issues of Big Data?

16 February 2015  |  3054 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsInnovationTransaction banking

Is Agile the answer to the question?

12 February 2015  |  3893 views  |  6 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationInnovation

Greek Musings

12 February 2015  |  2275 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulation

Ian's profile

job title Director
location London
member since 2014
Summary profile See full profile »
Change catalyst & solutioneer with almost 35 years of experience in financial services, most of that shaping and delivering complex and transformational change. I am passionate about finding smarter w...

Ian's expertise

Member since 2014
7 posts1 comments
What Ian reads
Ian's blog archive
2015 (7)

Who's commenting on Ian's posts