Earthport posts H1 trading update

Earthport (AIM: EPO.L), the leading payment network for cross-border payments, is pleased to provide an unaudited trading update for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2017 (“FY 2017”).

1 comment

External

This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.

Financial Highlights

• Revenues grew by approximately 33% to £30.3 million (FY 2016: £22.8 million)
o Approximately 90% of the revenue growth was driven by the existing client base
o Transactional revenues comprised 95% of FY 2017 total revenues
• Adjusted gross profit1 increased by approximately 30% to £20.7 million (FY 2016: £15.9 million)
• Adjusted gross margin1 decreased by approximately 2% to 68% (FY 2016: 70%)
• Administrative expenses decreased approximately to £25.5 million (FY 2016: £25.8 million), representing 84% of revenues (FY 2016: 113%)
• Adjusted EBITDA2 loss decreased by approximately 65% to £2.4 million (FY 2016: £6.9 million)
• Cash Balance at 30 June 2017 amounted to £11.9 million, compared to £14.4 million at 30 June 2016

Operational & Transactional Highlights

• Monetary value of transactions processed increased by 48% to $17.5 billion3 (FY 2016: $11.8 billion)
• Record number of transactions at approximately 11 million, up 67% (FY 2016: 6.6 million)
o Earthport’s payments processing platform continues to perform at a 99.9% “up-time” rate, ensuring virtually uninterrupted service for our clients
• A total of 143 new opportunities, inclusive of existing and new clients, are currently in the commercial pipeline
• Total of 10+ new countries in our Network pipeline
• Executed payments across 193 destination countries, in 49 currencies
• Average revenue per transaction of £2.64 (FY 2016: £3.12)

Sponsored [Webinar] AI in Banking: Building Compliant and Safe Enterprise AI at Scale

Related Company

Keywords

Comments: (1)

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

It might be helpful to know what interest, tax, depreciation and amortization were, so as to judge what the net loss was, and how it compares to the full-year 2016 figure. There is also a need to clarify what EBITDA2 means as opposed to EBITDA. In my understanding EBITDA2 is the EBITDA just for Q2 2017, meaning that the annualised figure would be quadruple the £2.4 million for Q2 alone: a annualised loss of £9.6 million, far worse than the impression of an improvement implied by the figure in brackets of Full-Year EDITDA loss of £6.9 million.

[On-Demand Webinar] Ensuring Interoperability in the Age of Global, Cross-Border e-InvoicingFinextra Promoted[On-Demand Webinar] Ensuring Interoperability in the Age of Global, Cross-Border e-Invoicing