26 July 2017
visit www.finastra.com

European savings and co-operative banks join screen-scraping row

26 June 2017  |  8007 views  |  1 EU flag

Trade groups representing over 5000 European savings and co-operative banks have called on the European Banking Authority to reject Commission amendments to the revised Payment Services Directive which would require banks to provide a fall-back interface to screen-scraping technology for third party access to consumer bank data.

The proposals to outlaw screen scraping in favour of bank-led access to client data under APIs were first trailed by the publication of the EBA's Regulatory Technical Standards for PSD2 in February.

The suggestion has led to an uproar among mature fintech startups, who have lobbied hard for a reversal of the decision, claiming that the reforms will provide banks with the means to control what data is shared, putting new entrants at a disadvantage.

The European Commission has since intervened on their behalf, asking the EBA not to ban screen scraping outright but to hold it in reverse as a back-up mechanism should bank interfaces fail to function properly.

In their joint submission to the EBA, the European Savings and Retail Banking Group (ESBG) and the European Association of Co-operative Banks (EACB), argue that the Commission's position willfully misunderstands the functioning of online banking architecure, nor takes account of the resources and costs required to provide a fail-back interface.

The lobby has suggest a compromise proposal which suggests that the EBA define a minimum average availability rate of the designated interface that would release compliant banks from the burden of providing a screen-scraping fall back.

The ESBG and EACB's complaints follow an earlier intervention by the European Banking Federation, which contended that the privacy of client data, cybersecurity and innovation would all be at risk should the Commission force the EBA to backtrack on its plans.
KeywordsOPEN APIS

Comments: (1)

Arjeh Van Oijen
Arjeh Van Oijen - IBM GBS - Amsterdam | 29 June, 2017, 07:32

Absence of service level specification of the PSD2 API services is a gap in PSD2 at the moment. It is not only availability, but also response times and the maximum numer of API request one TPP can send in per second. In addition it is recommended to specify what the response of the payment initiation implies. Does that mean the payment has been received, payment is validated and is going to be processed, payment is guaranteed and fraud check, AML check and funds reservation/debit have taken place so that the payment can't be rejected anymore by the debtor bank. If the end user buys a product in a store (or online) it is relevant for the merchant to have the guarentee it is going to receive the funds because as it will be handing over the goods which is irreversable. If this is going to be different from bank to bank the relevance of PSD2 may become significant less.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board: sign up now

Related stories

European Commission calls on EBA to rethink screen scraping ban

European Commission calls on EBA to rethink screen scraping ban

22 May 2017  |  6332 views  |  0 comments | 17 tweets | 21 linkedin
European banks lobby Commission to push ahead with screen scraping ban

European banks lobby Commission to push ahead with screen scraping ban

16 May 2017  |  10306 views  |  6 comments | 29 tweets | 36 linkedin
Fintech coalition formed to fight EBA plans to outlaw screen scraping

Fintech coalition formed to fight EBA plans to outlaw screen scraping

05 May 2017  |  9705 views  |  5 comments | 30 tweets | 23 linkedin
EBA to relax controversial PSD2 authentication rules

EBA to relax controversial PSD2 authentication rules

21 February 2017  |  20319 views  |  8 comments | 56 tweets | 77 linkedin

Related company news

 

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)
visit www.www.fisglobal.comdownload the paper nowdownload the paper now

Who is commenting?

A Finextra member Finextra Member Commented on: US firm to implant emp...
A Finextra member Finextra Member Commented on: US firm to implant emp...
A Finextra member Finextra Member Commented on: US firm to implant emp...

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against MastercardUK judge blocks £14bn class action su...
10331 views comments | 7 tweets | 6 linkedin
PayPal strikes deals with Chase and CitiPayPal strikes deals with Chase and Citi
9897 views comments | 10 tweets | 6 linkedin
Machines could take over 30% of bank jobs: McKinseyMachines could take over 30% of bank jobs:...
9320 views comments | 28 tweets | 27 linkedin
Yet more deals announced in payments sectorYet more deals announced in payments secto...
9281 views comments | 7 tweets | 21 linkedin
Wells Fargo Control Tower to map customer's digital footprintsWells Fargo Control Tower to map customer'...
8114 views comments | 7 tweets | 5 linkedin