I seriously don't get this. In a capitalistic society, utility companies are for-profit corporations. Shouldn't they be thrilled with the prospect of earning more revenues by selling more units of electricity? How I wish my industry - IT - faced this problem!
16 Jan 2018 12:11 Read comment
900 branches on a baseline of 5900 branches works out to a little over 15%. Assuming that the remaining 5000 branches is the Ideal Branch COunt as I defined in Why Branch And Digital Channels Will Coexist Forever, WF's actual IBCO% is 85%. Looks like my estimate that "IBCO will be around 60% of current branch count" understates banks' need for branches.
15 Jan 2018 13:13 Read comment
@DirkKinvig: Maybe that. Or he's a FLOC - "Fellow of Left Out Club" - and is bracing himself for blowback from customers over "lame" returns on his fund compared to crypto assets. And, going by Twitter, I see that blowback coming soon: There was this guy who was ranting against Robinhood App the other day. His tweet displayed two screenshots side-by-side. One was of Robinhood App showing 10% appreciation of his portfolio of conventional stocks and the other was Coinbase App showing 1000% appreciation of his BTC holdings.
12 Jan 2018 14:27 Read comment
With due respect, Warren Buffett was also skeptical about the rise of tech stocks in the 1990s and had then admitted in the oughties that he'd missed the tech boom.
12 Jan 2018 11:53 Read comment
LOL not in my wildest dreams did I imagine that "instant credit" would be for cab fare. Just my limitation, I guess.
10 Jan 2018 14:52 Read comment
I installed ICICI Store ("displays all mobile apps of ICICI Group in a single window" according to its Google Play Store description) ~3 years ago and deleted it ~2 years ago. Wonder what's new now?
09 Jan 2018 11:55 Read comment
Yaay, as I'd predicted last year at https://www.finextra.com/blogs/fullblog.aspx?blogid=12420, Brexit hasn't hurt UK Fintech one bit.
08 Jan 2018 11:12 Read comment
UK Fintech is faring even better than I'd predicted.
https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/31496/fintech-leads-the-way-as-investment-in-uk-tech-firms-doubles-in-2017
"...London's fintech sector remains a hotbed of investment activity, capturing the lion's share of a £2.99 billion venture capital splurge on UK tech firms."
"...VC investment into the UK’s tech sector reaching an all-time high in 2017 at almost double the £1.63 billion invested in 2016." "Brexit may be a dark cloud on horizon, but UK firms attracted almost four times more funding in 2017 than Germany (£694m) and more than France, Ireland and Sweden combined."
08 Jan 2018 11:11 Read comment
@JamesPiggot:
TY for your kind words. Yes, I did promise to explain why I think AXA Fizzy is on Blockchain in a follow-on post. But, a week after I made that promise, I'm still not able to find any compelling reasons for Blockchain and am literally losing sleep over the follow-on post:(. Statements like "...the Ethereum Blockchain is public, any crypto developer can therefore check the validity of the information we store there." on the FAQ page of AXA Fizzy's website are not making my job any easier.
"If they had to pay out for every late arrival then they have to charge more for our journeys, hence they have our best interests at heart!": ROTFL:)
There's a slight difference though: In the case of AXA Fizzy - and a couple of other Blockchain-based flight delay insurance companies - you need to pay money to buy the insurance policy, only then you'll get the compensation automatically (in your credit card account). I think the premium will help our "wonderful institutions" to keep their best interests at heart, too! That's why I predicted that "AXA Fizzy ... could potentially create a manifold increase in the size of the market for travel insurance products."
08 Jan 2018 10:06 Read comment
@CharmaineOak:
TY for your kind words.
That line is stated from insurance buyer's p.o.v. A genuine buyer would be quite offended if the insurer thinks their claim is fraudulent. A fraudulent buyer would be very offended:)
While I'll be covering the insurance carrier's p.o.v in the next installment, a few quick observations: (1) Tech is quite widely used in credit card fraud detection and prevention (2) I know at least two providers of tech for insurance fraud detection (3) In both cases, human intervention is used alongside tech (4) In case of this specific insurance product, the claim event is flight delay, which is in the public domain and outside the scope of defrauding by insurance buyer.
Where do you see scope for fraud by buyer?
06 Jan 2018 19:21 Read comment
Alex KregerFounder and CEO at UXDA Financial UX Design
Gilbert VerdianFounder and CEO at Quant
Béla VérFounder and CEO at ApPello
Marcus ScaramangaFounder and CEO at Minexx
Heather XiaoFounder and CEO at Horizon Zero Ltd
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.