Community
Even if you’re not directly interested in antipodean fragmentation, Australia will provide a particularly pure data set for what is fast becoming a global phenomenon. This is because (right now at least) there is only one primary and one alternative venue. It’s too early to draw any meaningful conclusions but, as the charts below show, Chi-X Australia seems to have made a more positive start than its counterpart in Japan. This is shown by the fact that Chi-X Japan took almost six months to achieve the same share of trading volume captured by Chi-X Australia in its first two weeks of operation. Then again, Chi-X Japan faced a more complicated clearing and settlement situation and had to contend with a short selling ban, too.
It’s also interesting to note that average trade size for Chi-X Australia is around one third of the market average. Is this indicative of greater HFT activity? And, if so, will this mean greater volumes for all concerned, or is it just more noise for the buy-side to contend with (one of the great unintended consequences of the pro-competition regulations in the US and Europe)?
Whatever happens, Australia will take its own path and I am sure that other alternative market operators will be studying its progress with interest.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Erica Andersen Marketing at smartR AI
28 September
Anurag Mohapatra Director of Fraud Strategy and Marketing at NICE Actimize
26 September
Anil Kollipara Vice President, Product Management at Spirent
Nkahiseng Ralepeli VP of Product: Digital Assets at Absa Bank, CIB.
25 September
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.