17 October 2017
Paul Penrose

Finblog

Paul Penrose - Finextra

307Posts 1,340,629Views 246Comments
Finance 2.0

Finance 2.0

A community for discussing the application of Web 2.0 technologies to financial services.
A post relating to this item from Finextra:

Finra issues social networking guidance

26 January 2010  |  10957 views  |  0
2665.jpg
US regulatory body Finra has issued guidance to securities firms and brokers on the use of social networking Web sites such as facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn to communicate with the public.

Finra's social media mash up

11 February 2010  |  4999 views  |  0

Lots of chatter in social media circles yesterday about this report on the New Comm Biz blog cocerning a financial services employee who was allegedly forced to remove his LinkedIn profile in response to Finra's recent Web 2.0 guidance note.

"I received a disturbing email from a friend of mine," the post begins. "I have changed the message and obscured any personal or employer reference for obvious reasons."

Here's what our anonymous source had to say: "Due to the recent Finra ruling I will have to take down my LinkedIn profile. The finance industry is so far behind the curve on social media communications it may be a while before my profile is back. In the meantime, feel free to contact me via e-mail or on Facebook (while I can still use it!)."

Whether you believe the report or not, this is clearly crazy. Not only does the Finra note specifically permit the use of LinkedIn, the self-regulatory organisation has a rather comprehensive LinkedIn profile of its own, replete with links to Finra employee profiles.

For a rather more nuanced critique of Finra's policy we must turn to the law and disorder blog of Ars Technica. This points out that the regulatory note requires firms to retain records of all "business-related communications on social networks, whether those communications are official or from associated persons." As for how such record-keeping is to be implemented, "Finra does not endorse any particular technology to keep such records, nor are we certain that adequate technology currently exists."

"So," says Ars Technica "Finra has asked Wall St. to monitor its employees' social media profile pages, blogs, and communications, using tools that don't yet exist and taking an "it depends on the facts and circumstances" stance in sorting out offending posts/tweets/comments from non-offending ones"

Small wonder that Wall Street firms are in a bit of a muddle about how to interpret the ruling. Trying to tame technology is a mug's game. Just ask the SEC, (ref: HFT/dark pools morass). Finra should have left well alone.

TagsWholesale banking

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Paul

ANZ and Visa lose the plot

30 June 2011  |  6648 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlineRetail banking

Don't give up the day job...ever

20 May 2010  |  5869 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionWholesale bankingGroupWhatever...

Now we are ten

19 April 2010  |  6257 views  |  3 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRetail bankingWholesale banking

Finextra's Best of the Web

05 March 2010  |  5773 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRetail bankingWholesale banking

The ATM was the last great financial innovation

25 February 2010  |  9850 views  |  8 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRetail bankingWholesale bankingGroupFinance 2.0

Paul's profile

job title Head of Research
location London
member since 2007
Summary profile See full profile »
I'm responsible for editorial content and quality control across the full range of Finextra media.

Paul's expertise

Member since 2006
307 posts246 comments

Who's commenting on Paul's posts