20 July 2018
Visit www.gemalto.com

UK building societies 'delaying' Basel II compliance

26 November 2004  |  2636 views  |  0 Source: BlueMax IT

BlueMax IT, a leading provider of Compliance Professionals to the Banking and Finance Industries, believes many Building Societies are relying on their small size to delay implementation of the Basel II Directives.

Having surveyed all 63 members of the Building Society Association, BlueMax found that almost 50% of Societies had yet to actually commence operations to achieve compliance – due by the end of 2006. Just over 30% were planning to commence the pre-study phase in the beginning of 2005, but more worryingly almost 20% had not yet considered what would be involved or didn’t consider currently they needed to take any action.

Of the 63 Societies, only 21% - or 13 Societies – were confident that they had the Project in place and resourced to ensure that they would be compliant across all three pillars on time – and not surprisingly these were the larger societies.

Many of the smaller societies considered that the Capital Adequacy requirements would not present a problem, but that credit and operational risk requirements could be achieved with minimal effort and resource.

Whilst Basel II was generally viewed as a positive step, particularly the Credit Risk requirements, most felt they had sufficient controls in place to minimise risk. Given the historical background of the Building Society Industry and their conservative approach to Capital Adequacy under the rules of their Mutuality, most felt they had taken the right approach, and didn’t need additional controls.

Nigel Wood of BlueMax was surprised so many Societies seemed unaware of the need to clearly understand the implications of achieving compliance, and that they seemed to rely of the fact that they were small. The common theme seemed to be (with the smaller Societies) 'We will do the minimum we need to, but we won't think about it until closer to the time'. In some cases, there seemed confusion regarding whether they need to achieve compliance by the end of 2006 - or to start then!

Said Wood, "If it is true that little needs to be done, surely it would be better to allocate resources earlier to carry out pre-study and assessment early rather than later. Basel II implementation will require considerable resource and management commitment, and Societies should understand the scope of the project as soon as possible to avoid expensive and disruptive last minute resourcing in order to make the deadline."

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)
Visit iliad-solutions.com/Visit info.nice.comVisit http://go.jumio.com/finextraAd

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
Calmejane quits Lloyds Bank to join SocGenCalmejane quits Lloyds Bank to join SocGen
12707 views comments | 6 tweets | 7 linkedin
Hong Kong plans September go-live for blockchain-based trade financeHong Kong plans September go-live for bloc...
10140 views comments | 9 tweets | 17 linkedin
Mastercard enlists Worldpay to push Vocalink's Pay by Bank appMastercard enlists Worldpay to push Vocali...
9666 views 19 comments | 15 tweets | 30 linkedin
IBM to test dollar-pegged 'stablecoin'IBM to test dollar-pegged 'stablecoin'
6613 views comments | 4 tweets | 14 linkedin
Bringing about new systems and faster payments globallyBringing about new systems and faster paym...
6428 views comments | 2 tweets | 7 linkedin

Featured job

Basic c Euro 120K, Variable Euro 120K - full ben...
Paris prefered London possible

Find your next job