24 March 2018
visit www.nextgenbanking.co.uk

Credit card firms pay $336m to settle currency conversion lawsuit

26 July 2006  |  2356 views  |  0 Source: Berger & Montague

A nationwide (US) settlement agreement has been reached in a consolidated federal class action lawsuit about use of certain payment cards for foreign transactions, In re Foreign Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1409).

The settlement agreement is subject to Court approval. The parties will submit the settlement agreement to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for preliminary approval.

The lawsuit concerns the prices that cardholders of Visa- and MasterCard-branded credit and debit/ATM cards, and Diners Club cards, have been charged to make transactions denominated in a foreign currency or with a foreign merchant. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants violated federal and state antitrust laws, disclosure laws, and other legal requirements. The defendants deny any wrongdoing. The Court has not made any ruling on the merits of the case. Settlement was reached following years of litigation, after extensive negotiations, and with the assistance of a mediator.

Under the settlement, defendants will pay $336 million to create a settlement fund to pay monetary claims by eligible cardholders, the costs of administering the settlement and notice to cardholders, and any Court-approved fees and expenses to attorneys for the class and awards to the class representatives. The settlement also includes provisions relating to disclosures on billing statements and other documents. Implementation of the claims process will involve a third party administrator.

Defendants in the case include Visa, MasterCard, Bank of America, Bank One/First USA, Chase, Citibank, Diners Club, HSBC/Household, MBNA and Washington Mutual/Providian. Card accounts covered by the settlement include brands such as Visa, Interlink, Plus, MasterCard, Cirrus, and Maestro.

The settlement documents also include agreements to settle certain related lawsuits, including Schwartz v. Visa, No. 822404-4 (Alameda Cty., CA). If this settlement is approved, claims in those and other related lawsuits will be extinguished.

Details of the settlement agreement will be released after submission to the Court.

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Related company news


Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)
visit www.ebaday.comVisit http://info.nice.comVisit www.nextgenbanking.co.uk

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
hands typing furiouslyBitcoin at 50,000 USD?
14511 views 0 | 8 tweets | 5 linkedin
BBVA tests 'invisible payments' technology at inhouse cafeBBVA tests 'invisible payments' technology...
11940 views comments | 16 tweets | 35 linkedin
RBS hatches plan to create digital challenger bankRBS hatches plan to create digital challen...
11539 views comments | 12 tweets | 23 linkedin
Barclays partners seven watch brands for contactless timepiecesBarclays partners seven watch brands for c...
10541 views comments | 14 tweets | 31 linkedin
Germany's N26 readies for US launch with EUR110 million capital injection led by Allianz and TenCentGermany's N26 readies for US launch with E...
8409 views comments | 14 tweets | 10 linkedin

Featured job

Six-Figure-Base, Double OTE, Benefits Package
London, UK

Find your next job