12 December 2017
visit www.avoka.com

Credit card firms pay $336m to settle currency conversion lawsuit

26 July 2006  |  2342 views  |  0 Source: Berger & Montague

A nationwide (US) settlement agreement has been reached in a consolidated federal class action lawsuit about use of certain payment cards for foreign transactions, In re Foreign Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1409).

The settlement agreement is subject to Court approval. The parties will submit the settlement agreement to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for preliminary approval.

The lawsuit concerns the prices that cardholders of Visa- and MasterCard-branded credit and debit/ATM cards, and Diners Club cards, have been charged to make transactions denominated in a foreign currency or with a foreign merchant. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants violated federal and state antitrust laws, disclosure laws, and other legal requirements. The defendants deny any wrongdoing. The Court has not made any ruling on the merits of the case. Settlement was reached following years of litigation, after extensive negotiations, and with the assistance of a mediator.

Under the settlement, defendants will pay $336 million to create a settlement fund to pay monetary claims by eligible cardholders, the costs of administering the settlement and notice to cardholders, and any Court-approved fees and expenses to attorneys for the class and awards to the class representatives. The settlement also includes provisions relating to disclosures on billing statements and other documents. Implementation of the claims process will involve a third party administrator.

Defendants in the case include Visa, MasterCard, Bank of America, Bank One/First USA, Chase, Citibank, Diners Club, HSBC/Household, MBNA and Washington Mutual/Providian. Card accounts covered by the settlement include brands such as Visa, Interlink, Plus, MasterCard, Cirrus, and Maestro.

The settlement documents also include agreements to settle certain related lawsuits, including Schwartz v. Visa, No. 822404-4 (Alameda Cty., CA). If this settlement is approved, claims in those and other related lawsuits will be extinguished.

Details of the settlement agreement will be released after submission to the Court.

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Related company news

 

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)
visit www.atos.netvisit http://info.nice.comvisit www.response.ncr.com

Who is commenting?

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
Revolut lets customers buy Bitcoin, Litecoin and EthereumRevolut lets customers buy Bitcoin, Liteco...
18656 views comments | 26 tweets | 22 linkedin
Saxo Bank's 'Outrageous Prediction': Bitcoin to peak at $60k next year before spectacular crashSaxo Bank's 'Outrageous Prediction': Bitco...
11573 views comments | 7 tweets | 7 linkedin
Deutsche Bank paper hails 'huge' blockchain potentialDeutsche Bank paper hails 'huge' blockchai...
8092 views comments | 15 tweets | 21 linkedin
Santander UK poaches Barclays innovation chief Michael HarteSantander UK poaches Barclays innovation c...
6860 views comments | 8 tweets | 17 linkedin
Alior Bank to use Open API platform and accelerator to create fintech marketplaceAlior Bank to use Open API platform and ac...
6227 views comments | 19 tweets | 10 linkedin

Featured job

Competitive
New York, NY - USA (some flexibility on location)

Find your next job