22 March 2018
visit www.ebaday.com

Bond Market Association criticises UK disaster planning proposals

07 May 2003  |  3762 views  |  0 Bond Market Association criticises UK disaster planning proposals

The Bond Market Association has criticised UK Treasury proposals calling for governmental intervention and power to suspend trading in financial markets in times of emergency.

The US-based Association, which represents securities firms and banks that underwrite, trade and sell debt securities in Europe and in the United States as well as internationally, says it favours market-based approaches over governmental mandates in dealing with potential financial disruptions. The BMA also maintains that the primary focus in an emergency should be on keeping markets open.

The Association filed its comment letter in response to a Treasury consultation paper on the financial system and major operational disruption.

Scott Rankin, head of the BMA's European office, says a market-based approach provides meaningful incentives for firms to invest in systems and employees and to prepare contingency plans that will allow them to continue operations in the event of market disruptions.

Moreover, he cautions against the UK and EU institutions taking parallel but inconsistent approaches to addressing these situations, which would ultimately be harmful since the UK and the Eurozone bond markets are so closely bound to wider global markets and the financial infrastructure of other countries.

According to Rankin, "the increasingly international nature of fixed income and derivative markets makes further review of the need for UK legislative authority critical".

Governmental suspension power is inconsistent with policies in other countries and, since the over-the-counter market is among the most international of the markets, this raises further questions about which contracts would or would not be affected by a UK trading suspension, causing further market distress, says Rankin.

"The Association believes that it would be extremely difficult for government, in an emergency situation, to act in a way that would not add to disruption in the markets," he adds. "We do not feel that a strong enough case for governmental intervention was made in the HM Treasury Paper, and we continue to favour market-based approaches in times of emergency."

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board: sign up now

Related stories

BMA trade matching RFI draws 27 responses

BMA trade matching RFI draws 27 responses

15 April 2003  |  5143 views  |  0 comments
BMA hits out at terror proposal

BMA hits out at terror proposal

19 March 2003  |  3658 views  |  0 comments
SunGard invests £5 million in City recovery centres

SunGard invests £5 million in City recovery centres

14 March 2003  |  4999 views  |  0 comments

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)
Visit www.facebook.com/business/Register your place today

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
hands typing furiouslyBitcoin at 50,000 USD?
13251 views 0 | 5 tweets | 4 linkedin
Can banks be a threat to Big Tech?Can banks be a threat to Big Tech?
10818 views comments | 31 tweets | 40 linkedin
BBVA tests 'invisible payments' technology at inhouse cafeBBVA tests 'invisible payments' technology...
10195 views comments | 14 tweets | 32 linkedin
RBS hatches plan to create digital challenger bankRBS hatches plan to create digital challen...
10078 views comments | 12 tweets | 23 linkedin
Barclays partners seven watch brands for contactless timepiecesBarclays partners seven watch brands for c...
9706 views comments | 14 tweets | 29 linkedin

Featured job

Competitive base + commission
London, UK

Find your next job