03 September 2014

Stuart Clark

Stuart Clark - Impendium Systems

272 | posts 348,704 | views 0 | comments

Financial Services Regulation

This network is for financial professionals interested in staying up to date on financial services regulation happening anywhere in the world. CFOs, bankers, fund managers, treasurers welcome.

FSB identifies the need for more intense supervision

30 April 2014  |  702 views  |  0

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) identified as a priority the need for more intense and effective supervision, particularly of systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), after the financial crisis.  The FSB has published two papers:

- Supervisory Intensity and Effectiveness - progress report on enhanced supervision. This describes the changes in supervisory practices since the financial crisis and identifies that institutions’ progress toward consistent, timely, and accurate reporting of top counterparty exposures meets neither supervisory expectations or industry self-identified best practices. 

The area of greatest concern remains institutions’ inability to consistently produce high-quality data. Work identified for supervisors is to:

o   remain focussed on ensuring the necessary changes are embedded in firms;

o   confirm that risk management and measurement are strengthened in firms;

o   enhance their own IT systems for using data collected; and

o   focus on ongoing monitoring of the improved BCBS bank capital models.

In parallel with supervisors implementing these changes toward more effective supervision, the FSB’s future work will focus on the measurement of supervisory effectiveness.

- Guidance on Supervisory Interaction with Financial Institutions on Risk Culture - framework for assessing risk culture. This sets out that a sound risk culture should ensure that:

o   an appropriate risk-reward balance consistent with the institution’s risk appetite is achieved when taking on risks;

o   an effective system of controls commensurate with the scale and complexity of the financial institution is properly put in place;

o   the quality of risk models, data accuracy, capability of available tools to accurately measure risks and justifications for risk taking can be challenged; and

o   all limit breaches, deviations from established policies and operational incidents are thoroughly followed up with proportionate disciplinary actions when necessary.


Related links:



Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Stuart

FSB to publish report on sharing derivative data

08 May 2014  |  1317 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation

BCBS publishes capital standard for bank exposures to CCPs

07 May 2014  |  2019 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation

EIOPA chair calls for extended powers of inquiry

06 May 2014  |  683 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation

EC consults on the definition of FX financial instruments

02 May 2014  |  1195 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation

ESAs issue RTS for non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives

01 May 2014  |  987 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation

Stuart Clark

job title

Product Development Director

company name

Impendium Systems

member since




Summary profile See full profile »
Co-founded Impendium in 2006. Previously head of Client Services for Deutsche Banks top 100 cust...

Stuart's expertise

What Stuart reads
Stuart writes about

Who is commenting on Stuart's posts