20 September 2014

US Federal Reserve pushes ahead with Faster Payments planning

05 February 2014  |  6705 views  |  8 back of one dollar note 2

The US Federal Reserve Board is pushing ahead with plans to further the introduction of faster retail payments as part of a broad effort to modernise the country's payments infrastructure.

The Reserve Banks released a consultation paper in September 2013 solciting comments on gaps and opportunities in the payment system. By the close of the consultation exercise in December, the Fed had received more than 200 responses, with more than half coming from non-banks.

Responses were submitted by individual financial institutions, businesses, payment networks and processors, software vendors, payment innovators, consultants, and consumers, as well as from trade groups representing financial institution and business members.

Sandra Pianalto, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and chair of the Financial Services Policy Committee, which issued the paper, says: "We are carefully reviewing the feedback that we have received on the consultation paper to identify common themes and issues for future focus, as well as insights into potential solutions."

In concert with this, the Reserve Banks have extended their information-gathering exercises to further explore the needs related to faster retail payments. They include research on end-user demand for specific payment attributes and an assessment of alternatives for speeding US payments. A third effort involves identifying gaps and opportunities related to payment system security.

Pianalto says updates will be shared with industry stakeholders in the coming months via a number of Fed and industry forums and communications.

"The Reserve Banks remain committed to the continual improvement of the US payment system and will work collaboratively with stakeholders this year and beyond to implement innovations that meet evolving end- user needs for speed, efficiency and security," she says.

Comments: (8)

Bo Harald - ZEF and Real Time Economy Program - Esbo | 05 February, 2014, 14:10

One must hope that this includes support for downstream automation - ie electronic invoicing as

1. automated payment initatior,

2. real time payments,

3. data extraction from e-invoices feeding automated sales tax reporting and payments,

4. e-invoice data feeding account statements to create automated accounting for SMEs (and automated cash flow estimates).

Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 05 February, 2014, 15:36

Not sure how this tallies with the Nov. 2013 veto of such a faster payments system by American banks: 

http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/178_219/how-big-banks-killed-a-plan-to-speed-up-money-transfers-1063631-1.html

In any case, isn't "pushes ahead" an over optimistic assessment, considering the Fed seemingly has a 10 year horizon?    

http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/178_221/message-to-banks-speed-up-payments-or-fed-will-take-charge-1063690-1.html

Mark Mixter - GXS - Chicago | 06 February, 2014, 04:11

Pushing ahead - seems like just a bit of an overstatement.  Granted it's 'planning'.  Perhaps the Fed will be able to get this done faster than the EPC implemented SEPA

 

Bo Harald - ZEF and Real Time Economy Program - Esbo | 06 February, 2014, 07:35

See the big picture! Now is the time for automating - especially downstream for SMEs. 

 

Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 06 February, 2014, 08:00

@MarkM: Interesting that you've raised the comparison with EPC / SEPA. The way EPC can mandate SEPA for all banks in EU, does FED have similar power over the American banking industry? From what I know, a move like this requires a GO verdict by a supermajority of NACHA members. Given that they just took a NO GO decision a couple of months ago, what really are the options available to the FED?

Colin Kerr - Microsoft Corp - Chicago | 06 February, 2014, 21:41

It's a healthy debate and modernisation is definitely overdue. Compared to countries like the UK that have successfully implemented Faster Payments, the business case will be further muddied by the impact on the high number of connected financial institutions (1000s). Whether a revamped ACH or a brand new network, I can't see the industry voluntarily implementing Faster Payments soon. Like Check21, I believe (regrettably) that this will only come from regulation.

Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 07 February, 2014, 11:16

@ColinK: Mint, Geezeo and other PFM players have managed to provide exemplary account aggregation across 7K+ banks in USA. You've hit the nail on the head by pointing to the need for regulation. However, I don't find this regrettable: Regulatory intervention has proven to be the most powerful driver of action by banks worldwide when it comes to measures that undermine their revenues and profits. OFT mandated FPS in UK. A subsidiary of the central bank even runs the FPS-equivalent scheme in India. 

Bo Harald - ZEF and Real Time Economy Program - Esbo | 10 February, 2014, 14:22

Payment automation cannot really be achieved without structured e-invoices. Not to talk about automated accounting, VAT and Sales Tax reporting. All standards are ready in ISO20022..

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board, sign up now.

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)

Related stories

11 September, 2013
15 February, 2013
18 January, 2013
11 September, 2012
04 April, 2012
30 September, 2011
28 March, 2011

Related company news

 

Featured job

to £80k base, £160k OTE, benefits
London, UK

Find your next job