30 July 2014

Gary Wright

Gary Wright - BISS Research

277 | posts 906,104 | views 369 | comments

MiFID

A place to discuss MiFID

Getting to grips with Rogue Traders

17 October 2012  |  3225 views  |  1

At a City forum yesterday a representative from the FSA presented the seventeen definitions behind the operational risk management principles, which financial services firms are expected to practice to prevent rogue trading and other fraudulent activities.

I could not help noticing that the word ‘limit’ was used frugally. It was in fact only used only once within the definitions. Surely this is an extreme limitation of a key word in an area where you would expect limit management and responsibility to be absolutely crucial.

Pre ‘Big Bang’ the financial institutions I worked in had very distinct and robust limit management controls. These controls were set and reviewed monthly by the risk committee and if the firm was entering a new product or market, the risk committee would undertake an assessment, which was then presented to the board for approval before any dealing commenced.

The risk limit structure was by trader/salesman, then by financial product/investor account and then market. This was both from a domestic and international aspect. The individual limit was set and managed by the desk limit, which in turn was managed by the department, then the risk committee and then the board.

Limit breaks were managed in real-time from the desk and reports of limit breaks reported at the days end, up through the various responsibilities I have just described. If there was a serious break the problem would be quickly escalated up through the chain of command.

Responsibilities were clearly set and if they were regularly broken reprimands given, or suspension or job loss in the most serious cases. Everyone knew their roles and responsibilities and limit breaks were kept to the minimum. Rogue traders were not part of the City vocabulary until Nick Leeson.

Why then with this proven risk management structure working well in the past, do regulators and FIs find it so difficult to manage today? Don’t give me arguments about complexity or volume, as today we enjoy some of the best technology ever devised to assist, which was not available back then. I suspect the real reason why we see it prevailing today is down to people.

It’s the culture within FIs, the capability of people to understand their responsibilities and the ability to do their job and the fear of becoming a whistle blower, which causes many of the problems.

Managing limits is easy, providing there is stringent and robust management and a structure that enables transparency of problems so early resolutions can be introduced. And of course the penalties for failure must be severe and acted upon.      

TagsTrade executionRisk & regulation

Comments: (2)

Bruce Bland - Fidessa - London | 17 October, 2012, 14:04

At last someone else who shares my view that without limits, looking for fraudulent activity becomes a very wishy washy affair! Having just finished the design of a market abuse detection system, I can honestly say that it would have been considerablely easier if the regulatory authorities had put a bit more effort into setting limits that could be checked.

Its worth remembering that most rogue traders started off with small losses. At some stage these must have past a limit!

A Finextra member | 17 October, 2012, 14:32

Thanks Bruce times may change in the markets but the basics always stay the same.I wonder sometimes if the whole industry is being run by dummies

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Gary

Wealth Management - Turkeys Vote for Christmas

27 September 2013  |  2582 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0

The future of systems in financial services

29 July 2013  |  2548 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0

Social media and trust in financial markets

25 June 2013  |  4806 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0

Technology changing the markets

25 June 2013  |  2494 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0

Technology begins to change

14 June 2013  |  2028 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0
name

Gary Wright

job title

Analyst

company name

BISS Research

member since

2007

location

London

Summary profile See full profile »
CEO of B.I.S.S. Research, founder of the BISS Independent Accreditation for all systems and servi...

Gary's expertise

Who is commenting on Gary's posts