Compare this survey with a report last week which said:

"With the Oyster card now dominant on London's transport network, just 1.5% of bus fares - 24 million journeys a year - are paid for with cash."

Clearly the overwhelming majority of London commuters do not find contactless payments in a transport setting "scary".

Why should a contactless payment in any other setting be any different?

Perhaps we have over emphasised the technology, rather than focussing on the simple act of payment, which they already know?

It is also a woefully small number of people questioned. 

I wish there was more detail on the types of questions asked or where they were asked.

Comparing something that is pretty much mandated on the London Transport network as a result of the fare structure, and is a electronic wallet that has to be physically topped up, to paying routinely for goods via contactless payments on a debit or credit card is not valid though.

If someone is getting access to my bank account I want that to be done consciously and securely, with a receipt and proper authorisation through use of a PIN rather than just by waving my card in the direction of a terminal.

It is a valid comparison when you also consider that on 1oth April a separate Finextra story also said:

In the four months since the launch of contactless payments on buses on 13 December 2012 the number of people using their contactless payment card has continued to rise each week. From 2,061 people making 2,586 journeys paid for on their contactless payment card on the first day in December, up to 10,000 people are now making as many as 16,000 journeys each day.

These 10,000 people per day are paying directly with their debit or credit card, rather than their Oyster card.

This volume is also 5 time larger than the entire sample size of the survey quoted in the article, of which less than a quater said they fund contactless "scarry". 

I know some people will worry about securuty etc, but that is the case with any new technology. The main issue  for me is does it add any value for the customer, and for small and fast payments, it probably does.

Very soon it will be second nature to pay this way!

I suspect, like most surveys of this type, it is a self selcting audience due to the way the questions have been stuctured and I suspect Go Compare has an agenda that will always create a biased report. 

The move to a cashless society is inevitable. It doesn't even have to be the policy of any political party, as it will come via technological evolution and the public's demand for its many conveniences. Before this can happen, a cashless society will naturally require a plethora of public debate.  

The cashless society will only come about when whores, drug dealers and plumbers accept electronic payments.

Rest assured, the criminal classes already take cards. Plenty of evidence that the likes of Square, Pingit etc are already being used to purchase what most would descirbe as illegal goods and services. 

"The cashless society will only come about when whores, drug dealers and plumbers accept electronic payments."

Well whores are using Square.

And drug dealers have bitcoin on the Silk Road.

You'll never get plumbers to ditch cash though.

I completely agree with Paul Love's comment, which is the first comment in this thread. In Australia, as everywhere else, Visa payWave and Mastercard PayPass are as natural as breathing air.  There is no fear, problem or controversy with using them.  Only scaremongers and lunatics think that there is a problem.  Smartphone take up and use is going to explode in several years' time, and it could replace your physical wallet, if you want it to.  With the huge take up of smartphones and virtual wallets, Visa payWave, Mastercard PayPass and American Express ExpressPay, which is the same as payWave or PayPass, the broad mass of people will not think twice to use payWave, PayPass or ExpressPay.  It will be like getting in your car in the morning to go to work.  Too easy!