27 April 2018
visit www.ebaday.com

Esma consults on non-EU counterparties OTC derivatives

17 July 2013  |  1507 views  |  0 Source: European Securities and Markets Authority

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has launched a consultation on draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) aimed at implementing the provisions of the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) related to OTC derivative transactions by non-European Union (EU) counterparties in certain cases, and aimed at preventing attempts by non-EU counterparties to evade EMIR's provisions.

The Consultation Paper clarifies the conditions where EMIR's provisions regarding central clearing or risk mitigation techniques would apply to OTC derivatives by two non-EU counterparties which have a direct, substantial and foreseeable effect in the EU. The proposed RTS would only apply when two counterparties to the same transaction are established outside the EU, their jurisdictions' rules are not considered equivalent to EMIR, and where one of the following conditions are met:

One of the two non-EU counterparties is guaranteed by an EU financial counterparty for at least €8bn of the gross notional amount of OTC derivatives entered into and for an amount of at least 5% of the OTC derivatives exposures of the EU financial counterparty; or
the two non-EU counterparties execute their transactions via their EU branches.
Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, said:

"Today's proposals aim at ensuring that non-EU counterparties whose derivatives deals have a direct and substantial impact on EU financial markets are subject to EMIR's clearing obligation or risk mitigation requirements. This is key in ensuring that any risk posed to the EU's financial markets by non-EU counterparties' transactions is adequately managed, thereby reducing any potential financial stability risks."

The provisions in the draft RTS included in the consultation paper also aim at preventing the evasion of the regulatory requirements, such as would be the case if derivatives contracts between non-EU counterparties were being concluded without any business substance or economic justification, and in a way to evade the clearing obligation and risk mitigation provisions. 

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Related company news

 

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)
Visit http://response.ncr.comVisit http://wup.digitalvisit www.ebaday.com

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
Irish central bank tunes in to fintechIrish central bank tunes in to fintech
9917 views comments | 20 tweets | 21 linkedin
TransferWise launches multi-country bank accountTransferWise launches multi-country bank a...
9231 views comments | 26 tweets | 22 linkedin
JPMorgan to roll out Voice ID; begins branch expansionJPMorgan to roll out Voice ID; begins bran...
9101 views comments | 6 tweets | 8 linkedin
Physical cash retains its popularity in face of electronic onslaughtPhysical cash retains its popularity in fa...
8755 views comments | 15 tweets | 17 linkedin
TSB customers rage as migration to Sabadell platform goes awryTSB customers rage as migration to Sabadel...
8723 views comments | 6 tweets | 6 linkedin

Featured job

Find your next job