/payments

News and resources on payments systems, innovations and initiatives worldwide.

NatWest bank brands fined for overcharging interchange fees

Four banks in the NatWest stable - National Westminster Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, Ulster Bank and Coutts & Company - have been hit with a £1.82 million fine for overcharging interchange fees on credit cards.

  4 1 comment

NatWest bank brands fined for overcharging interchange fees

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

The Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) opened an investigation into the banks four years ago after the issue was picked up during routine monitoring.

It found that the banks incorrectly treated a number of cards as being ‘commercial’ cards when they should have been treated as ‘consumer’ cards. This meant that fees charged by these banks weren’t capped and were set at too high a level.

As a result, both acquirers and, ultimately, merchants were overcharged. The PSR found that the banks wrongly profited from almost £1.2m in excess interchange fees between March 2016-18.

Chris Hemsley, managing director of the PSR, comments: “The interchange fee caps were put in place to reduce the cost of accepting customer card payments for shops and other merchants’ businesses. The banks broke the rules by failing to bring themselves in line with the caps.

"Not only have the banks reimbursed the fees to acquirers which they were not entitled to collect, but we have also fined them for their failings."

Sponsored [Impact Study] 2024 Fraud Trends in Banking, Insurance, and Beyond

Comments: (1)

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

This strikes me as a considerable piece of disinformation, and a much less impressive result than the PSR would like us to believe.

The Decision Notice states neither the total monetary amount of the purchases from merchants made on these cards to which the over-deduction of Interchange Fees relates, nor the over-deduction, nor the original, total deduction.

Only the over-deduction will have been reimbursed to the merchants, leaving the larger, residual deduction unreimbursed. A complete view would furnish the relationship of the over-deduction with both the residual deduction and the total monetary amount.

As it was the intention of the Interchange Fee Regulation that the Interchange Fee be the only deduction experienced by merchants, we will then be able to appreciate the extent of the failure of the PSR and the other UK authorities to properly interpret and implement the Regulation, and allow the payment cards ecosystem to continue to trouser between 3-8% of face value on a fast-rising proportion of UK payments.

A fine of £1.8 million is peanuts compared to that, which points to the over-deduction being peanuts as well, and the total monetary amount being a drop-in-the-ocean of the amount paid by cards every day and subjected to fat deductions.

We would also like to see a statement of the PSR’s costs for this case, and see if their costs were higher than the fine and the reimbursed over-deduction.

[Webinar] PREDICT 2025: The Future of AI in the USFinextra Promoted[Webinar] PREDICT 2025: The Future of AI in the US