PSD2's narrow focus limiting the potential of Open Banking - report

PSD2's narrow focus limiting the potential of Open Banking - report

Shortcomings in the EU's Second Payments Directive (PSD2) are holding back the wider uptake of Open Banking in the UK, according to a report commissioned by the oversee body for the programme.

The requirement for banks to conform to a limited set of rules mandated under PSD2 is leading to the opening up of a number of gaps in the implementation of Open Banking that "need to be addressed" states the report, which has been prepared by Fingleton's for the Open Banking Implementation Entity.

TPPs interviewed for the study bemoaned the absence of refund functionality, which is a critical feature for online merchants. Another is the inability for customers to pre-approve payments to a merchant, for example for subscription services or to automate sweeping between accounts. Currently customers have to manually authorise every payment.

Fingleton's says this could be solved if Open Banking were able to mandate “variable recurring payments” which would be cheaper for merchants and more secure for customers who currently have to hand over their card details to merchants to hold on file.

The report also recommends the creation of a new set of customer consent rules for deletion of data upon termination of a service, and TPP-side re-authentication when required to ensure continuity of service. This would allow users to provide TPPs with continued consent to access their data without having to revisit their bank’s website or app. Currently, consumers are forced to re-authenticate with each TPP through their bank every 90 days, which is an unnecessary inconvenience.

The study also recommends the extension of Open Banking to a wider range of products beyond current accounts, such as cash savings accounts, mortgages, pensions and insurance.

"The narrow focus of the Open Banking APIs limits their potential to drive wider competition in the financial sector, for example by helping customers shop around for better interest rates on savings accounts or cheaper mortgages," states the report. "Extending Open Banking to these other financial products would drive more competition and better consumer outcomes."

John Fingleton, CEO of Fingleton, says: “Open Banking is the first attempt by competition authorities to use technology to rebalance complex markets towards consumers. While great progress has been made so far, more is needed to guarantee that it takes off with consumers and business users. This matters for more than just banking: making a success of it here gives us a model for similar steps in other markets where customer inactivity or loyalty can leave people worse off."

In response, the OBIE is planning to create “Premium APIs” that sit above the mandatory “Regulatory APIs”, providing a commercial incentive for banks to up their game and address some of the gaps in implementation.

OBIE trustee Imran Gulamhuseinwala comments: “This report clearly demonstrates how far the Open Banking initiative has progressed, and the potential that exists to help create a banking market that better serves consumers and small businesses.

"Nonetheless, PSD2 is not a complete solution and we need to further develop the Standards if Open Banking is to fully meet its objectives. As the report points out, there is a pressing need to address refunds, Premium APIs and Open Finance.”
Editorial | what does this mean?
This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

Comments: (3)

Dharmesh Mistry
Dharmesh Mistry - Temenos - Reading 18 July, 2019, 09:13Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Surely a broader set of API's should not have to be driven by regulators. What this implies is banks are failing to appreciate the opportunity of open banking. Look at OCBC and Saxo bank in Asia, their API support is far greater than what regulators mandate, they see the real opportunity.

If banks aren't redesigning every system to support API's initially for internal use, then selectively for external publication, then they are missing the point/opportunity.

Banks should think like Bezos, everything must be API enabled else your sacked!

John Power
John Power - Ostia Solutions - Bray 18 July, 2019, 10:00Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

A broader set of APIs makes sense but if every bank does this in their own way, it doesn't help anyone as a different interface will require work to access each and every bank.

Where PSD2 fell down is that it said what must be done but did not say how so we now have multiple standards across the EU.

While OBIE has it is by no means perfect, I believe their direction is the correct one. Ultimately we don't want to care what bank we are dealing with, we just want to use the APIs. When the banks want to innovate and create premium APIs, wont that be a fantastic place to be.

At the same time, the intent behind PSD2 was good in that if the banks were not mandated to do this, we would simply not be where we are now.

Dharmesh Mistry
Dharmesh Mistry - Temenos - Reading 18 July, 2019, 10:07Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Totally agree John, amen to premium. ApI's which is really what I was talking about.

Another area that should be mandated is the product catalogue, this would allow much more innovation in product distribution and encourage switching...

Find out more
Find out more

Trending Stories