22 October 2017
Find out more

Axa Rosenberg pays $242m over quant coding cock-up and cover-up

04 February 2011  |  12203 views  |  0 Man writing graphs on glass wall

Investment firm Axa Rosenberg has agreed to pay $242 million to settle SEC charges that it covered up a computer code error in its quantitative investment model that cost clients millions of dollars.

The firm, a unit of French insurer Axa, will pay $217 million to harmed clients and a penalty of $25 million, although it has not admitted or denied the SEC findings.

According to the watchdog, senior management at Axa Rosenberg units learned in June 2009 that there was a "material error" in the model's code that disabled one of the key components for managing risk.

Yet, instead of disclosing and fixing this error immediately, a senior official directed others to keep quiet about it and declined to fix the problem.

The firm's CEO only learned of the issue in November 2009 and an internal investigation was set up. The SEC was informed in March 2010 after the company was told it was about to be examined with clients finally not hearing of the problem until April.

The SEC also slammed Axa Rosenberg for misrepresentations and omissions about the error to clients, attributing the model's under-performance to market volatility.

Meanwhile, the coding process for the model represented a serious compliance risk because accurate coding is required for it to function properly and in the manner represented to clients.

Robert Khuzami, director, division of enforcement, SEC, says: "To protect trade secrets, quantitative investment managers often isolate their complex computer models from the firm's compliance and risk management functions and leave oversight to a few sophisticated programmers. The secretive structure and lack of oversight of quantitative investment models, as this case demonstrates, cannot be used to conceal errors and betray investors."

In a statement, Dominique Carrel-Billiard, chairman, Axa Rosenberg, says: "We deeply regret that the coding error adversely impacted many of our clients. The exhaustive review that we undertook of this matter reflects our commitment to regaining our client's confidence and restoring trust."

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board: sign up now

Related stories

Former Goldman Sachs programmer convicted over HFT code theft

Former Goldman Sachs programmer convicted over HFT code theft

13 December 2010  |  9707 views  |  0 comments
Former SocGen trader found guilty of code theft

Former SocGen trader found guilty of code theft

23 November 2010  |  9385 views  |  0 comments
Axa Rosenberg discovers coding error in risk program

Axa Rosenberg discovers coding error in risk program

27 April 2010  |  8504 views  |  0 comments
Moody's hit by report of computer coding error

Moody's hit by report of computer coding error

21 May 2008  |  9530 views  |  0 comments

Related company news

 

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)
visit www.vasco.comvisit www.innotribe.comvisit www.niceactimize.com

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
Mastercard to roll out blockchain APIMastercard to roll out blockchain API
13223 views comments | 17 tweets | 28 linkedin
HSBC partners Bud for open banking trialHSBC partners Bud for open banking trial
12253 views comments | 22 tweets | 28 linkedin
satelliteGates Foundation backs Ripple collaboratio...
9549 views comments | 13 tweets | 10 linkedin
Sibos 2017: API or the highwaySibos 2017: API or the highway
9146 views comments | 11 tweets | 22 linkedin
IBM uses blockchain to improve cross-border payments processingIBM uses blockchain to improve cross-borde...
8571 views comments | 9 tweets | 18 linkedin

Featured job

Competitive base, double ote, benefits
London, UK

Find your next job