18 August 2017
visit www.avoka.com

Maestro loses UK domain name fight

15 January 2008  |  8111 views  |  0 URL

MasterCard's debit card subsidiary Maestro has lost its legal battle with a UK Internet domain name dealer over the ownership of the maestro.co.uk Web address.

Maestro lost its original case for control of the Web address in September 2007 after an independently-appointed expert ruled in favour of Mark Adams, who registered the Web address on 5 April 2006 and connected it to his own site.

Maestro appealed the case but Nominet, the dispute resolution service for .uk registry, refused to overturn the original ruling.

According to a document detailing the Nominet ruling, Adams intends to use the maestro.co.uk address "for music downloads, educational and tuition services".

However Maestro argued that Adams had registered a series of domain names, including beverlyhillscop.co.uk, bigbrothertv.co.uk and popidol4.co.uk, that are similar to well known trade marks - a practice commonly known as cybersquatting - and that his registration of maestro.co.uk was "abusive".

The Nominet panel accepted that Adams' domain portfolio has some "obviously objectionable names" and he is making what appears to be "disingenuous, self-serving claims in respect of the domain name". But the panel ruled in favour of Adams because it was not satisfied with the evidence that the maestro.co.uk domain name was an "abusive registration".

It appears that Adams' case was helped by the fact that Maestro is a generic word.

"Where a domain name is a single ordinary English word, the meaning of which has not been displaced by an overwhelming secondary meaning, the evidence of abuse will have to be very persuasive, if it is to be held to be an abusive registration," says the ruling.

Domain names can prove a lucrative business - sex.com sold for a reported $12 million in a private sale in January 2005, whilst Vodka.com sold for about $3 million last year.

However cybersquatting is a growing problem, along with typosquatting - also known as URL hijacking - which involves the registration of domain names containing trademarked terms or misspelled words that closely resemble company Web sites and are used in a bid to divert traffic from legitimate sites.» Download the document now 71.9 kb (PDF File)
KeywordsLEGALPEOPLE

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board: sign up now

Related stories

WallStreet Web address fails to sell

WallStreet Web address fails to sell

15 October 2007  |  3581 views  |  0 comments
Typosquatters target credit union domains

Typosquatters target credit union domains

13 September 2006  |  6082 views  |  0 comments
HBOS signs with NetNames for online brand protection

HBOS signs with NetNames for online brand protection

08 October 2004  |  6124 views  |  0 comments
Royal Bank of Scotland protects online brands with NetNames

Royal Bank of Scotland protects online brands with NetNames

06 September 2004  |  5109 views  |  0 comments
Bank brands under threat from cybersquatters

Bank brands under threat from cybersquatters

01 December 2000  |  3423 views  |  0 comments

Related company news

 

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)
visit www.dorsum.euvisit www.niceactimize.comvisit www.worldpaymentsreport.com

Who is commenting?

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
China preps central clearing house for mobile payments providersChina preps central clearing house for mob...
10308 views comments | 8 tweets | 16 linkedin
Monzo appoints Curve co-founder Foster-Carter COOMonzo appoints Curve co-founder Foster-Car...
8515 views comments | 1 tweets | 3 linkedin
hands typing furiouslyCompliance: Overcome the data deficit
7937 views 0 | 1 tweets | 9 linkedin
Uneasy sits the crown as cash use continues declineUneasy sits the crown as cash use continue...
7905 views comments | 3 tweets | 7 linkedin

Featured job

Competitive
London, UK (or flexible)

Find your next job