25 July 2016
Find out more

Bank backs down and reimburses cyber-attack victim

03 August 2011  |  16456 views  |  2 cash

Comerica Bank has ditched plans to appeal the ruling of a Michigan court last month and has reimbursed a small business customer that was hit by wire fraud scammers.

Judge Patrick Duggan of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan ruled that the bank should have done a better job of picking up the fraudulent transactions worth over $1.9 million running from the company's accounts after its financial controller was duped into opening a malware-laden phishing e-mail.

Comerica was ordered to reimburse the firm to the tune of $560,000 but pledged to file an appeal against the Michigan ruling, pushing the issue higher up the justice system to an appellate court, where the verdict will hold sway over future district court adjudications.

However, according to BankInfoSecurity, a change of heart has occurred and the bank has paid the settlement.

The question of whether a bank is responsible for ACH wire fraud has been in the spotlight over the last couple of months. Before the Comerica ruling, a presiding magistrate in Maine ruled that Ocean Bank was not responsible for the loss of around $345,000 from a business customer account following a similar cyber-attack.

Since then California-based Village View Escrow has become the latest US business to sue its bank after having its account drained by cyber-thieves, seeking reimbursement for the $465,000 it lost.

Comments: (2)

Aidan Tyndall
Aidan Tyndall - B-Line Support Services Ltd - London | 04 August, 2011, 12:38

Strikes me that theses firms have very poor controls if these sums a money are disappearing from their accounts

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 04 August, 2011, 17:24

Not necessarily. According to the complaint filed in the latest case - link to which is available in my below Finextra post - the plaintiff (Village View Escrow) spotted the loss the very next day. 

http://www.finextra.com/community/fullblog.aspx?blogid=5590

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board: sign up now

Related stories

Another US bank sued by hacked customer

Another US bank sued by hacked customer

19 July 2011  |  11956 views  |  0 comments
US judge backs bank against customer who sued over hack

US judge backs bank against customer who sued over hack

08 June 2011  |  7765 views  |  3 comments
Banks face greater scrutiny under White House cyber-security plans

Banks face greater scrutiny under White House cyber-security plans

13 May 2011  |  6363 views  |  0 comments

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)
Visit capgemini.comFind out moreVisit www.abe-eba.eu

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
MasterCard agrees £700m VocaLink acquisitionMasterCard agrees £700m VocaLink acqu...
8679 views 14 comments | 32 tweets | 37 linkedin
satelliteContactless Bitcoin startup Plutus Tap &am...
8526 views comments | 8 tweets | 3 linkedin
hands typing furiouslyWhat Every FinTech CEO Should Know About R...
8329 views 0 | 14 tweets | 8 linkedin
hands typing furiouslyBanking on IoT: Security in the Internet o...
8080 views 3 | 20 tweets | 7 linkedin
Santander doubles down on fintech fundSantander doubles down on fintech fund
7741 views comments | 22 tweets | 28 linkedin

Featured job

Find your next job