08 December 2016
Bill Blythe

Gresham Computing

Bill Blythe - Gresham

5Posts 10,863Views 0Comments

Counting the cost of non-compliance

05 August 2014  |  2078 views  |  0

AIFMD, Basel III, Dodd-Frank, EMIR, Solvency II…There’s a raft of regulations for banks and asset managers to comply with. The cost of compliance is a concern to C-level execs across the board. But the thing that is really keeping heads of operations up at night is the consequence of not complying with the new rules. If processes aren’t adequate and compliant, these execs will be held accountable and risk being hit by hefty fines and even jail terms

So what are the requirements? The themes running through the regulations are transparency, auditability and control. Firms must make enterprise-level systems an investment priority to avoid falling foul of the regulators. Manual processes and spreadsheets may be quick to set up, but they are unreliable, open to manipulation, prone to glitches and offer no audit trail.

So why have banks been clinging on to their spreadsheets? Historically, trying to onboard reconciliations for complex, non-standard transactions into legacy systems has been a lengthy and difficult process. Traditional recs systems are simply unable to handle the complexities and many projects to shoe-horn complex transactions into these systems have ended in failure. Fortunately, those days are gone. With new technology and options for deploying reconciliations in days, rather than months, either on-site or through the cloud, financial institutions can now get up and running quickly without resorting to spreadsheets and other workarounds.

This speedy deployment is good news for heads of operations. With regulators cracking down on the unaudited processes lurking in siloes, they’re looking for individuals to hold accountable. To avoid this wrath heads of operations must safeguard their processes (and livelihoods) by investing in reconciliations technology that provides a complete, auditable view of the organisation and slashes the reliance on spreadsheets.

TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Bill

Keeping up with the exchanges - the ETD challenge

21 April 2015  |  2471 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & ops

Taking a best practise reconciliation approach to IBOR

12 November 2014  |  3051 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionPost-trade & ops

Counting the cost of non-compliance

05 August 2014  |  2078 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Derivatives reporting: a tale of two cities

30 April 2014  |  1605 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Reconciliations: a new weapon of choice

26 February 2014  |  1659 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Bill's profile

job title Global Business Development Director
location London
member since 2014
Summary profile See full profile »

Bill's expertise

What Bill reads
Bill writes about
Bill's blog archive
2015 (1)2014 (4)

Who's commenting on Bill's posts