24 March 2018
Bill Blythe

Gresham Computing

Bill Blythe - Gresham

5Posts 12,397Views 0Comments

Derivatives reporting: a tale of two cities

30 April 2014  |  1882 views  |  0

2014 and the implementation of EMIR heralded the beginning of European reporting of derivatives transactions to trade repositories. As a result, firms must get to grips with their trades both internally and externally. The aim of the regulation was to make it easier to identify and reduce systemic risk. Sounds good on paper, right? In practice, the short-term outlook is far from rosy.

A cloud of confusion is hovering over these reporting requirements, descending on all who try to make sense of it. To further complicate matters, the US has been trying to get its head around its own set of reporting requirements for the past year. Introducing European requirements has further muddied the water as both sets of legislation are not identical. The result? Awkward transactions spanning two jurisdictions and a major problem for two of our biggest global financial hubs.

Not only are the financial institutions unclear about what is going on, but so are the regulators. The CFTC has indicated it is struggling to get to grips with the immense volume of data it is receiving as a result of Dodd-Frank. Over in Europe, ESMA released a reporting Q&A document mere hours before mandatory reporting was due to begin. This kind of eleventh hour approach sends out alarming signals. So what’s the solution?

Firms must be absolutely confident in the data they present to the regulator. This can only be done by ensuring they have a holistic view of their trades. Ensuring a good reconciliation platform is in place internally is vital. Moving beyond spreadsheets gives the certainty that all trades are captured and accounted for in real time. This level of detail is invaluable when it comes to both EMIR and Dodd-Frank. If firms can do this, they are well on their way to clearing the clouds of confusion and complying with reporting requirements.

If EMIR and Dodd-Frank attain their goal, they will make the markets a better place by reducing risk and ensuring we have a clear picture of what is going on. This transparency is desirable but in order to reach it, firms and regulators on both sides of the pond must first ensure they have a clear internal view in order to be able to correctly report externally. 


TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Bill

Keeping up with the exchanges - the ETD challenge

21 April 2015  |  2851 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & ops

Taking a best practise reconciliation approach to IBOR

12 November 2014  |  3460 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionPost-trade & ops

Counting the cost of non-compliance

05 August 2014  |  2321 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Derivatives reporting: a tale of two cities

30 April 2014  |  1882 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Reconciliations: a new weapon of choice

26 February 2014  |  1884 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Bill's profile

job title Global Business Development Director
location London
member since 2014
Summary profile See full profile »

Bill's expertise

Member since 2014
5 posts0 comments
What Bill reads
Bill's blog archive
2015 (1)2014 (4)

Who's commenting on Bill's posts