18 December 2017


Retired Member

3,251Posts 11,859,051Views 3,524Comments

The MiFID II monster

04 April 2014  |  3163 views  |  0

The three legislative institutions of the European Union reached agreement on MiFID II / MiFIR on 14th January 2014. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has now commenced work on implementing both the directive and regulation but, given the size of the task, it is anticipated that the rules won’t come into effect until late 2016 or even early 2017.

Assuming this timetable, banks and market participants would be forgiven for thinking that they had plenty of time to position themselves and make the necessary preparations to be ready for the changes. However, contrary to popular belief, MiFID II is far more than just an extension of MiFID I, which was designed to promote greater transparency and harmonisation for market participants. MiFID II introduces some fundamental changes to the way OTC markets operate and will impact a broader spectrum of institutions.

The key areas that the directive and regulation will impact are:

  • Market structure
  • Price transparency
  • Commodities position reporting
  • Conduct of business
  • Organisational governance

Changes to these key areas will potentially result in huge changes to the operating models and revenue streams of banks. For OTC derivatives it is likely that the requirements for central trade execution and price reporting will be wider than for Dodd Frank as the legislative text introduces the concept of ‘liquid markets’ for eligible products. The definition of what constitutes a ‘liquid market’ in the eyes of ESMA is bound to result in a lengthy and fractious debate amongst market players. Banks will need to split their businesses into systemic internalisers and multilateral trading facilities (MTFs) / organised trading facilities (OTFs) depending on whether they are acting as an agent or principal to the trade.

MiFID II / MiFIR will impact everyone engaged in the dealing and processing of financial instruments and will fundamentally change the shape of the industry. The intricacies of the legislation have yet to be ironed out, but its broad scope and depth are clear indications that MiFID II is a regulatory monster in the making. Firms wishing to placate this beast will need to start work now as once it is fully formed it will be very difficult to work with.  

TagsRisk & regulation

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Retired's profile

job title
member since 2014
Summary profile See full profile »

Retired's expertise

Member since 2009
3181 posts3,524 comments
What Retired reads

Who's commenting on Retired's posts

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Raymond Lee
James Andrew
Dharmesh Mistry
David Andrzejek
Ralf Ohlhausen
Tom Hay
Nicola Cowburn
Michael Wright
Charmaine Oak
Francis Chlarie