28 July 2016
Robert Siciliano

Identity Theft Expert

Robert Siciliano - IDTheftSecurity.com

730Posts 1,807,004Views 62Comments

Data Breach Notification Bill goes to the House

25 March 2014  |  2820 views  |  0

H.B. 224, a newly introduced data breach notification bill for New Mexico, would mandate that organizations notify breached individuals within 10 days of breach discovery (unencrypted credit card data); and within 10 business days notifying the state attorney general if more than 50 NM residents are affected.

 

The bill allows for a shorter notification deadline and for card carriers to sue for recovery costs linked to the breach; and customers can sue for statutory damages.

Companies operating in NM will also have additional data security and data disposal requirements, due to the bill. Enacting H.B. 224 would make New Mexico join 46 states who have data breach alert laws.

Payment Card Breach

  • Within two business days: Time allowed for card issuers facing a breach to notify all the merchants “to which the credit card number or debit card number was transmitted,” according to H.B. 224.
  • H.B. 224 would also set a risk of harm threshold regarding when an alert is required for card breaches.
  • If the magnetic strip data or other information is revealed, yielding harm or risk of harm to the cardholder and compromise of access device data, the bill would require notification. The card issuer would not need to give approval or direction.
  • Card issuers can sue for recovery of administrative costs if a card reader is breached or if there’s a problem with strip data.

Data Security and Disposal

  • The bill would make companies “implement and maintain reasonable” security measures to ensure protection of personal identifying information from illegitimate access or other fraudulent action.
  • Businesses would also have to include these data security standards in contracts involving “non-affiliated third parties” that they share personal information with.
  • Personal data, however which way it’s contained, be disposed of such that personal identifying information would be impossible to read or decipher.

Enforcement

  • The bill would authorize the state attorney general to seek injunctive relief and recovery of damages via court.
  • Failure of a company to notify of the breach could result in harsh fines, if the bill is enacted.
  • Customers could sue for damages of $100 to $300, depending on circumstances.

Being accountable:

It may be just a matter of time before the Federal government steps in and decides PCI Standards might not fix client data protection problems. Businesses who see the writing on the wall are being proactive and making smarter investments in their customers security.

 

a member-uploaded image TagsSecurity

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Robert

32 Million Twitter Pass for sale Add two-factor NOW

21 July 2016  |  2525 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurity

Phone Account of FTC Chief Technologist hijacked

14 July 2016  |  2304 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurity

Viruses as Cyberweapons for sale

12 July 2016  |  3148 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurity

TeamViewer Clients Victims of other Hack Attacks

08 July 2016  |  4309 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurity

Can Two-Factor Authentication actually fail?

06 July 2016  |  2651 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurity

Robert's profile

job title Security Analyst
location Boston
member since 2010
Summary profile See full profile »
Security analyst, published author, television news correspondent. Deliver presentations throughout the United States, Canada and internationally on identity theft protection and personal security....

Robert's expertise

Who's commenting on Robert's posts

Raul Thomas
Ketharaman Swaminathan
Lee Mughal
Balasubramaniam Gd
Dirk Kinvig