06 December 2016

44975

Retired Member

2,018Posts 6,636,007Views 2,335Comments
Finextra community

Financial Services Regulation

This network is for financial professionals interested in staying up to date on financial services regulation happening anywhere in the world. CFOs, bankers, fund managers, treasurers welcome.

Law Society sets out views on EMIR reporting requirements

20 March 2014  |  997 views  |  0

The City of London Law Society (CLLS) regulatory law committee has published a memorandum on the potential legal uncertainties which may arise as to the application of the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) – and specifically its reporting requirements - to ordinary corporate transactions and arrangements (e.g. between companies and their shareholders, when capital raising, with share scheme arrangements for employees).

The memorandum sets out the implications of the widely drawn definition of a derivative under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) which is used in EMIR to define the application of its provisions. The memorandum sets out the view that there should be a distinction drawn between OTC derivatives traded between corporate entities and financial counterparties for speculative and hedging purposes (in respect of which there is a discernable "market") and those private arrangements entered into by companies with their employees and shareholders or with other non-financial companies, as part of ordinary corporate transactional business and for very different purposes.

The memorandum sets out why the CLLS considers that it was not the regulators' intention to capture such transactions and advocates extending the Financial Services Authority's approach in MiFID to adopt a "dominant characteristic" test, applying this to corporate transactions before conducting a technical analysis of whether a component of the transactions is or is not a derivative for the purposes of MiFID and therefore reportable under EMIR.

8 examples of the application of this to the non-financial counterparty corporate sector are provided to give clear and proportionate guidance so that unnecessary and counterproductive confusion is not created and that reports provided focus on speculative and risk management instruments which are reportable.

Related link:

http://www.citysolicitors.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=152&Itemid=469%20

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Retired

An industry matured: highlights from Mobey Day 2016

18 October 2016  |  952 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRetail bankingInnovation

Reorganising for the Age of Collaboration

27 September 2016  |  2528 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

Fintech innovation in the B2B space has only just begun

12 September 2016  |  13643 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsInnovation

Protecting Data with DLP

23 August 2016  |  5339 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurityBrexit

How to end what ails online commerce

22 August 2016  |  4773 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsTransaction banking

Retired's profile

job title
location
member since 2014
Summary profile See full profile »

Retired's expertise

What Retired reads
Retired writes about

Who's commenting on Retired's posts

Alex Aleksandrovski
Ketharaman Swaminathan
João Bohner
Steven Hatton
Graham Seel
Nikhil Thadani
Gerard Hergenroeder
Konstantin Rabin
Dharmesh Mistry
Matt Schofield
Anna Robert
Ian Davis