Blog article
See all stories »

To IP, or Not To IP..?

After yesterday's blog sparring session between Messrs Skinner and Goldman, I thought I'd add my own 2p worth to the debate and risk being accused of not reading or understanding either gentleman properly!

Those who have followed my blogs on the subject of innovation in banking will not be surprised to learn that I fall more into the corner of Chris Skinner than Michael Goldman, especially when it comes to retail banking.

Having spent 10 years, roughly half my career to-date, working in private banking and wealth management, I can see where Michael is coming from. But, I believe the needs of those seeking investment advice are separate and almost irrelevant to core retail banking products and services.

As I alluded to in a previous blog about 10 year olds, banks need to ask themselves whether the next generation of customers will want to do their retail banking in a branch, or by flicking open their Nintendo DS Lite or Sony PSP equivalent device?

It will take banks at least a generation to change, so they better start now!

A former colleague of mine, John Slater, has already successfully launched a solution in this space. Some of you may even have watched his interview on Finextra.

Now, I am not advocating the technology adopted or his company (as that would be against our community rules), but I do think it worth pointing readers in the right direction for their own education as to what is possible and where trends are taking our industry.

Back in June 2006, John's initiative was apparently lauded by TowerGroup Analyst Robert Hunt at the firm’s client conference in Boston...

“Most European banks are using core banking systems designed in the 1980s. These systems could not anticipate changes such as the internet, 24/7 banking, and cross-border mergers,” said Robert Hunt, research director in the Retail Banking Practice at TowerGroup. “To effectively compete in this new environment, banks will need to replace their core systems. Further, it makes little sense for these banks to develop a new core system in-house when vendors are able to deliver functionally rich and flexible real-time systems that operate on low-cost, scalable platforms.”

In May earlier this year SlaterLabs announced that Bank J.Van Breda & Co had joined The Etude Programme for Core Banking Applications - the world's first core banking application built entirely on Microsoft .NET.

And in July this year the Etude™ System established a number of new world records for banking application software performance. Etude achieved a staggering 7,129 business transactions per second throughput over a sustained business day period without dip or failure; more than 69,000 database batches per second throughput over the same business day period; and less than .045 second response time for all transactions throughout all periods.

As we keep saying as vendors to banks (Yes, I crossed over to the dark side), the technology is out there to solve their challenges and secure their future - the real question is whether the banks will see the threat coming before it is too late.

To be honest, if I was a betting man, I would put my money on the major retail "banking" services providers of the future coming out of innovation by companies that are currently not banks (or at least were not, until recently making intelligent use of legislation in places like Luxembourg).

6309

Comments: (3)

Alan Goodrich
Alan Goodrich - ERI - Luxembourg 29 November, 2007, 11:20Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Michael, much of what you say is right and the questions you ask are mostly valid... but you lose me when it comes to branches...

Yes, retail banking is looking to tap the mass affluent market by offering more and more wealth management, asset management, investment banking and private banking services.

I have been around this industry for almost as long as I can remember. My father was an investment manager and I have spent practically all my career (over 20 years) working in stockbrokers, investment banks, private banks or vendors into the same.

Wealthy clients very rarely set foot inside our premises. Our financial advisors, relationship officers or portfolio managers (call them what you like) interacted either by phone or by visiting the customer. People trust people. I don't see that aspect of human nature changing and I don't see affluent people having the time or inclination to go to a branch, whatever it may look and feel like.

The other aspect of your argument I find a little paradoxical is where you see the threat coming from. Do you really see banks in emerging markets entering our mature markets by revamping the branch experience?

Not so long ago, ING Direct was unknown in the UK. In a very short period of time it has captured market share in deposits and is now cross-selling into mortgages - without a branch in sight!

Ed Daniel
Ed Daniel - esdaniel.com - Europe 29 November, 2007, 12:28Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Here's a profile snapshot of the digital-gen punter:

In Defense of Gen Y Workers

Spoiled? Entitled? Forget it. Generation Y employees simply know what they want, know what works, and won't settle for anything less from the companies and managers for whom they work.

http://www.cio.com/article/157050

In a world where personal service and quality of service become the differentiators as service delivery of core products becomes ever more a commodity affair it will be a bank's ability to protect and nurture its customers through sound commercial advice that will underpin a bank's success - if the customer thinks more of the bank as a partner in their life plan the more important it will be the bank behaves like one - if a bank measure's it's success on it's customers' success we might actually be getting somewhere, wouldn't we!?

Of course many might say this is in place - I doubt that what exists today is working all that well as per the legacy issue otherwise we'd know what to do with the branches :->

 

Julian Hensman
Julian Hensman - seOrb - Brussels - London 30 November, 2007, 08:34Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

My career has so far spanned 22 years, half of which was in banking and the other half in Banking related IT. So I write this post more as a branch user than a banker.

I think you are all right in your own ways (Chris, Mihael, Alan) and perhaps what you are describing is differentiators between different banks, which all have their place. I have experienced banking from two aspects, one where I had money and one where I did not. My honest opinion, and personal experience, is if you have money, you never need to set foot in a branch and you are happy to go on-line. When you do not, and need to argue with someone about why you can't get an overdraft, that's when you want to go to your branch (not that anyone there is empowered enough to help you). If follows then that if a bank targets HNW, their branch networrk does not need to be extensive (e.g. like private banks) but when they target Joe Public, who let's face it don't have so much money and may not even have a computer, they need their customer service outlets (note I did not say sales!).

For completeness, with regards transactions, I live and work in Brussels and a lot of transactional banking here is done at hole-in-the-wall type terminals in banking lobbies. There are even such banking lobbies with no bank branch behind them. Separating these from the customer service aspects to me seems like a very good idea. Of course, they are IP based.

So my humble belief is that banks need to find out what their clients need from their branches before they make their decision on the position of the branch in the channel pecking order. Banks that target HNW will probably need far fewer branches than banks that target those needing to borrow.

Oh, and with my IT hat on, naturally IP should be the centre of the universe, let alone banks.

Alan Goodrich

Alan Goodrich

Regional Sales Manager

ERI

Member since

12 May 2003

Location

Luxembourg

Blog posts

16

Comments

7

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Trends in Financial Services

A community to discuss the future of financial services and any other interesting trends, strategies, ideas, views.


See all

Now hiring