26 October 2016
Chris Pickles

Chris Pickles

Chris Pickles - Picklesnet Ltd

109Posts 276,518Views 18Comments

Payments and the Eurozone

30 January 2013  |  3247 views  |  1

I’m in the Netherland today, talking to financial institutions about Payments.  Since the Euro was introduced in the EU, the challenge for payment processors has been pretty clear: how do you become the lowest-cost processor of Euro-denominated payments in the world?

Standardisation across multiple countries creates opportunities and threats.  Whether you’re talking about games software, electricity plugs and sockets or payment processing, the issue is the same Economics 101 issue as always: economies of scale.  If you are not processing a greater volume of payments transactions than any other payment service provider, then you are losing.  That’s as fundamental a law as gravity.

So what has changed since the Euro was introduced?  - because, after all, the Euro has been with us for 11 years now.  Which payments processor dominates in the Eurozone?  Let’s not get too confused about whether they are corporate payments, Internet payments, mobile payments – we’re in a world where a serious differentiator may not be the shape of the terminal because they all end up using the public Internet.

In similar situations, market feedback tends to be “we don’t want a monopoly” – but also tend s to be “we don’t want fragmentation”.  Two providers?  Three providers?

So who among the established payment processors is going to win this race in the real business world?  Or do we see a new market entrant coming in from the blind-side ?

TagsMobile & onlinePayments

Comments: (1)

A Finextra member
A Finextra member | 01 February, 2013, 18:53

Monopoly no but standards yes. Sadly when we talk standards we tend to talk in decades rather than years. Surely we can have a competing market of entities that compete on a service/price level not on some historicle stagnent position. The technology is there the need of society but those in situ are failing. Obvious threat is a third party entrant. There are loads of possibilities there. So do nothing looks not an option.

Enjoy the City Chris and the odd jenever 

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Chris

Will the UK lose its right to issue ISINs?

15 March 2016  |  4801 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & opsBrexit

Using instrument identifiers to reduce latency

27 January 2016  |  3131 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionPost-trade & ops

Mobile Payments and LSD

21 January 2016  |  2459 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlinePayments

MiFIR: How ISINs Work: 7

17 December 2015  |  3858 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

MiFIR: How ISINs Work: 6

14 December 2015  |  2581 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Chris's profile

job title Consultant
location Waterlooville
member since 2009
Summary profile See full profile »
I help organisations that work in the financial sector around the world to understand better how the sector works, how regulations impact the business operations of financial institutions, and how to...

Chris's expertise

What Chris reads
Chris writes about

Who's commenting on Chris's posts

Bruno  Schütterle
Ketharaman Swaminathan
Andrew Muir
Roger Storm
John Lathouwers